Does Denial of Conjugal Relations Constitute Mental Cruelty?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Delhi High Court ruled that denial of conjugal relations constitutes mental cruelty.
- Unconsummated marriages can be grounds for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.
- Threats and abandonment can justify dissolution of marriage.
- Evidence such as communication exchanges can support claims of mental cruelty.
- This ruling highlights the legal implications of marital obligations.
New Delhi, Dec 9 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court has affirmed a divorce decree awarded to a husband based on the grounds of mental cruelty, observing that the marriage was never consummated from the very beginning.
A panel comprising Justices Anil Kshetrapal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar dismissed the appeal by the wife who contested the Family Court's verdict from December 15, 2023, which dissolved her marriage.
The Justice Kshetrapal-led panel highlighted the wife's behavior, which included threats of false criminal charges, refusal to cohabit, and sudden departure from the matrimonial residence, as sufficient grounds for dissolution under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
It was noted that the couple spent a mere 40 days together following their wedding on May 6, 2017, and had been living apart since June 26, 2017.
The husband claimed that the wife consistently evaded physical intimacy, citing issues like illness or depression, and threatened to frame him in serious allegations if he insisted on cohabitation.
In its ruling, the Justice Kshetrapal-led panel stated that these claims were corroborated by WhatsApp and email communications from the early days of their marriage.
"The shared messages reveal a clear reluctance, hesitation, and unwillingness from the appellant (wife) to participate in conjugal relations during the essential early phase of marriage," the Delhi High Court remarked, noting that her own written statement referred to the relationship as "almost consummated," reinforcing the Family Court's ruling.
Agreeing with the Family Court's conclusion that the refusal of conjugal relations was deliberate and ongoing, the court ruled that this denial constitutes mental cruelty.
The Delhi High Court also dismissed the wife's assertion that she and her family had made multiple reconciliation attempts in locations such as Dhanbad, Noida, and even at a mall in December 2017.
"For all the reasons stated, this Court concludes that the Family Court's finding that the respondent (husband) demonstrated cruelty on a preponderance of probabilities is substantiated by the evidence and does not warrant appellate interference," stated the Justice Kshetrapal-led panel, affirming the divorce decree.