ED files chargesheet against 5 in ₹14.95 crore ADCL fund siphoning case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
ED files chargesheet against 5 in ₹14.95 crore ADCL fund siphoning case

Synopsis

The ED has filed a supplementary chargesheet against five accused in a ₹14.95 crore fraud on the B.R. Ambedkar Development Corporation — a government welfare body — using forged bank documents to prematurely drain fixed deposits. With prior chargesheets, asset confiscations, and a property attachment already on record, this case is steadily widening.

Key Takeaways

The ED Bengaluru Zonal Office filed a supplementary prosecution complaint on 5 October 2026 against five accused persons , including Ayub Sayyed .
The case involves alleged siphoning of ₹14.95 crore from the B.R.
Ambedkar Development Corporation Limited (ADCL) using forged documents and impersonation.
A fictitious current account was opened at State Bank of Mysore's HAL II Stage Branch , and four fixed deposits of ₹5 crore each were prematurely closed using fabricated instruments.
The ED had earlier filed an initial chargesheet on 25 March 2026 against 15 accused and sought confiscation of assets worth ₹6.02 crore .
A second Provisional Attachment Order on 22 July 2026 attached an immovable property worth ₹24 lakh .
The investigation, initiated on the basis of a CBI-ACB FIR, is ongoing and further action is expected.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Bengaluru Zonal Office, has filed a supplementary prosecution complaint (chargesheet) before the Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in Bengaluru against five accused persons, including Ayub Sayyed, in connection with the alleged siphoning of ₹14.95 crore from the B.R. Ambedkar Development Corporation Limited (ADCL) through forged documents and impersonation. The complaint was filed on 5 October 2026, according to an official ED statement.

How the Fraud Was Allegedly Carried Out

Investigators say the accused fraudulently opened a fictitious current account in the name of ADCL at the State Bank of Mysore's HAL II Stage Branch in Bengaluru using forged documents and impersonation. Once the account was in place, four fixed deposits of ₹5 crore each belonging to ADCL were allegedly prematurely closed using fabricated Term Deposit Receipt/Fixed Deposit Receipt (TDR/FDR) instruments and forged pre-closure letters.

The premature closure of these deposits reportedly resulted in the siphoning of ₹14.95 crore, which the ED has categorised as proceeds of crime under the PMLA, 2002. Investigators further found that these funds were allegedly routed through multiple bank accounts belonging to various individuals and entities, followed by transfers and cash withdrawals designed to conceal the money's origin.

Statements and Money Trail

Statements recorded under Section 50 of the PMLA indicated that the funds were knowingly received, transferred, and withdrawn as part of the alleged laundering process, according to the agency. The ED's investigation was initiated on the basis of an FIR registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation's Anti-Corruption Branch (CBI-ACB), Bengaluru, under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — both of which are scheduled offences under the PMLA.

Earlier Action in the Case

This is not the first legal move in the case. On 25 March 2026, the ED had filed an initial prosecution complaint before the Special Court in Bengaluru against 15 accused persons and entities, simultaneously seeking confiscation of assets worth ₹6.02 crore belonging to the accused.

Subsequently, on 22 July 2026, the agency issued a second Provisional Attachment Order, attaching an immovable property worth ₹24 lakh belonging to one of the accused. The latest supplementary chargesheet against the five individuals represents the third major legal step in this investigation.

What This Means for ADCL and the Accused

The B.R. Ambedkar Development Corporation Limited is a government-backed body established to support the socio-economic welfare of marginalised communities, making the alleged fraud particularly sensitive. The accused now face proceedings under the PMLA, which carries stringent provisions for attachment and confiscation of proceeds of crime, in addition to imprisonment.

The ED has confirmed that further investigation in the matter remains under way, signalling that additional chargesheets or attachment orders cannot be ruled out.

Point of View

Attachment order, and now a supplementary chargesheet — suggests investigators are still building the full money trail, implying more accused or assets may surface. The real accountability question is not just who received the funds, but how forged documents passed scrutiny at a nationalised bank branch in the first place.
NationPress
14 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ADCL fund siphoning case in Bengaluru?
It is a money laundering case involving the alleged fraudulent siphoning of ₹14.95 crore from the B.R. Ambedkar Development Corporation Limited (ADCL) through forged documents and impersonation at a State Bank of Mysore branch in Bengaluru. The ED is prosecuting the case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, following an initial FIR by the CBI-ACB.
Who is Ayub Sayyed and what is his role in the case?
Ayub Sayyed is one of five accused persons named in the ED's supplementary prosecution complaint filed on 5 October 2026. The ED has not publicly specified his individual role beyond his inclusion among those allegedly involved in the ₹14.95 crore siphoning from ADCL.
How was the ADCL fraud allegedly carried out?
According to the ED, a fictitious current account was fraudulently opened in ADCL's name using forged documents. Four fixed deposits of ₹5 crore each belonging to ADCL were then prematurely closed using fabricated TDR/FDR instruments and forged pre-closure letters, resulting in the siphoning of ₹14.95 crore.
What action has the ED taken so far in this case?
The ED filed an initial prosecution complaint on 25 March 2026 against 15 accused persons and entities, seeking confiscation of ₹6.02 crore in assets. It then issued a second Provisional Attachment Order on 22 July 2026, attaching a property worth ₹24 lakh. The supplementary chargesheet against five accused was filed on 5 October 2026, and further investigation is ongoing.
What is the significance of ADCL being the target of this fraud?
The B.R. Ambedkar Development Corporation Limited is a government-backed body created to support the socio-economic welfare of marginalised communities, making the alleged fraud particularly sensitive. Misappropriation of its funds is seen as both a financial crime and a failure of safeguards meant to protect public-welfare institutions.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 hour ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 6 months ago
  8. 7 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google