Is Pakistan’s ISI Still Supporting Jihadist Groups in Kashmir?

Click to start listening
Is Pakistan’s ISI Still Supporting Jihadist Groups in Kashmir?

Synopsis

A recent report raises serious concerns about Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and its ongoing support for jihadist groups in Kashmir. This backdrop of insurgency has profound implications not only for India but for regional stability as a whole. What measures can be taken to address this enduring issue?

Key Takeaways

  • ISI's involvement in supporting jihadist groups in Kashmir is a longstanding issue.
  • Proxy warfare is a key aspect of Pakistan’s foreign policy.
  • International accountability and sanctions are crucial to address these challenges.
  • The need for diplomatic clarity and sustained pressure on Pakistan is paramount.
  • Engagement from global powers, particularly the US, is essential for meaningful change.

Islamabad, Oct 9 (NationPress) Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) has been actively engaged in fostering insurgency within the Kashmir area of India by offering support and training to various Islamist jihadist factions, as reported on Thursday.

The report indicated that these terrorist organizations, including Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, conduct assaults in Kashmir and other regions of India, allowing Pakistan to maintain plausible deniability.

According to a report from Afghan media outlet Amu TV, the military and intelligence apparatus of Pakistan has been frequently accused of utilizing proxy jihadist groups as instruments of its foreign policy. From the conflicts in Kashmir to the resurgence of the Taliban in Kabul, Pakistani-backed terrorist entities have persistently engaged in warfare to fulfill Islamabad's strategic ambitions. This approach has remained unchanged since the initial Kashmir conflict following independence, where non-state actors were employed as low-cost instruments to exert pressure on more formidable adversaries, evade direct conflict, and sustain influence in adjacent nations.

“What appears logical to the strategists in Rawalpindi has resulted in decades of destabilizing consequences for the region and even for Pakistan itself. It is concerning how little action has been taken globally to alter this situation. The only viable solution is to render this strategy politically, financially, and reputationally unaffordable,” the report continued.

The report noted that despite formal prohibitions, these groups continue to function from within Pakistan. The 2008 Mumbai attacks were orchestrated by LeT, revealing the extent of Pakistan's strategy, with subsequent evidence indicating that the masterminds operated from Pakistan and were affiliated with the ISI.

“It is imperative to significantly increase the repercussions for such actions by any nation, ensuring that the ongoing support for extremist and terrorist organizations becomes more detrimental than beneficial. This can be achieved through various means,” it emphasized.

The reports underscored the necessity for diplomatic efforts to openly call out and hold accountable states that support terrorism, with multilateral platforms like the United Nations playing a critical role in condemning nations that engage in proxy warfare.

Economically, implementing sanctions and reducing aid are effective methods, alongside officially designating nations as sponsors of terrorism. Financial organizations such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) must persist in monitoring and applying pressure on countries with such histories until terrorism financing is adequately curtailed.

“In the context of Pakistan, the most clear-cut action is to halt military assistance, provide diplomatic clarity, and impose financial and military sanctions until there are verifiable and sustained actions against all terrorist factions, without exceptions or rebranding. This initiative should commence with the United States and be supported by the broader international community,” the report concluded.

Point of View

It is crucial to approach this sensitive issue with an unbiased lens. The ongoing struggle in Kashmir is a complex geopolitical challenge, necessitating a balanced understanding of all perspectives while firmly advocating for peace and accountability in international relations.
NationPress
10/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What role does the ISI play in supporting jihadist groups?
The ISI has been accused of providing training and resources to jihadist groups, using them as proxies to further Pakistan's foreign policy objectives.
What impact does this support have on regional stability?
The ongoing support for these groups contributes to instability in Kashmir and can lead to broader conflicts within the region.
How can the international community respond?
The international community can impose sanctions, cut military aid, and hold Pakistan accountable through diplomatic avenues.
What are the consequences of the 2008 Mumbai attacks?
The Mumbai attacks highlighted the extent of ISI's involvement and the need for greater vigilance against terrorism financing and support.
What strategies can be used to combat this issue?
Strategies include increasing political and financial costs for supporting terrorism, as well as fostering multilateral condemnation through organizations like the UN.
Nation Press