Did J&K LG Really Dismiss 3 Government Employees for Terror Links?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold move, J&K's Lt Governor Manoj Sinha has dismissed three government employees linked to terrorist activities, marking a significant step in combating the terror ecosystem in the region. This decision underscores the ongoing effort to safeguard national security and eliminate threats from within government ranks.
Key Takeaways
- The J&K Lt Governor dismissed three employees linked to terrorism.
- Dismissals were made under special powers without standard procedures.
- Article 311(2)(c) of the Constitution allows bypassing usual processes.
- Previous dismissals indicate a longstanding strategy against terrorism.
- Employee associations had ties to separatist movements before Article 370's abrogation.
Srinagar, June 3 (NationPress) In a continued effort to dismantle the terror ecosystem, J&K Lt Governor Manoj Sinha took decisive action on Tuesday by terminating three government employees due to their affiliations with terrorist organizations.
According to officials, this significant operation targeted those sympathetic to terrorism within the government framework. The dismissed individuals include Jammu and Kashmir Police constable Malik Ishfaq Naseer, a teacher from the School Education Department named Ajaz Ahmed, and Waseem Ahmad Khan, a junior assistant at Government Medical College, Srinagar. These individuals were reportedly linked to Pakistan-backed terror groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM).
“The trio was identified as active terror associates, engaging in arms smuggling, launching assaults on security forces, and providing essential logistical support to terrorists. They are presently in judicial custody,” stated an official.
The Lt Governor wields the authority to dismiss government employees with terrorist connections in J&K. These actions are executed without the conventional procedures required for such dismissals, as the special powers granted to the Lt Governor allow for bypassing the drawn-out processes typically outlined in service rules.
Under Article 311(2)(c) of the Constitution, the Lt Governor can circumvent regular procedures when an employee's actions threaten the state's interests or are oriented towards secessionist and anti-national activities.
Historically, the Lt Governor has dismissed over two dozen government employees connected to terrorism.
Prior to the revocation of Article 370, the grip of the state government over its employees was relatively loose, with the employees' association in Kashmir being a part of the separatist All Party Hurriyat Conference. Similarly, the Kashmir Bar Association, which is the elected body of lawyers, also participated in this separatist coalition.
Point of View
The recent dismissals by the J&K Lt Governor reflect the government’s unwavering stance against terrorism. By swiftly acting against individuals with terror affiliations, the administration is reinforcing its commitment to national security and the integrity of its public services.
NationPress
11/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why were the government employees dismissed?
The employees were dismissed due to their connections with terrorist outfits like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Hizbul Mujahideen, as they were found to be active terror associates facilitating arms smuggling and attacks on security forces.
What powers does the Lt Governor have in these cases?
The Lt Governor has the authority to dismiss employees linked to terrorism without following the usual procedures, as granted under Article 311(2)(c) of the Constitution.
Have there been previous dismissals of government employees for similar reasons?
Yes, in the past, the Lt Governor has dismissed over two dozen government employees due to their links with terrorism.
What was the situation regarding employees’ associations before Article 370 was abrogated?
Before the abrogation of Article 370, the state government had a loose grip on its employees, with some associations being affiliated with separatist groups.
What does this mean for national security?
These dismissals signify a strong commitment to national security and a proactive approach to eliminating threats from within government ranks.
