Vande Mataram row: Karnataka Congress defends two-stanza stand, BJP hits back

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Vande Mataram row: Karnataka Congress defends two-stanza stand, BJP hits back

Synopsis

The Congress Working Committee's call to sing only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram has reignited a familiar but fierce patriotism battle in Karnataka. With Congress citing Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay's original 1875 composition as justification and BJP calling it cultural disrespect, the row encapsulates a deeper ideological contest over who owns India's nationalist legacy.

Key Takeaways

The Congress Working Committee (CWC) decided to sing only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram , triggering a political row in Karnataka .
Karnataka Congress President B.K.
Hariprasad backed the decision on 20 August , citing the song's original 1875 composition by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay .
Hariprasad challenged BJP to prove patriotism by singing the National Anthem at RSS shakhas .
BJP MLA and Deputy Leader of the Opposition Arvind Bellad alleged the CWC move showed Congress had 'no connection with patriotism.' Bellad also targeted Sonia Gandhi and the CWC, claiming they 'do not care about Bharat and its culture.' The dispute reflects a long-running national debate over Vande Mataram's status as India's national song versus the National Anthem.

A fresh political clash has erupted in Karnataka over the Congress Working Committee's (CWC) decision to sing only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram, with state Congress leaders firmly backing the call and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) accusing the grand old party of disrespecting India's cultural heritage and freedom movement legacy. The row surfaced publicly on Thursday, 20 August, when leaders from both sides traded sharp remarks at separate press interactions in Bengaluru.

Congress Defends the CWC Decision

Karnataka Congress President B.K. Hariprasad welcomed the CWC's stand, asserting that the party would continue singing only two stanzas of Vande Mataram. He grounded the position in literary history, pointing out that Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay originally composed Vande Mataram as a two-stanza poem in 1875, and that the Congress stance was therefore historically consistent rather than politically motivated.

Hariprasad dismissed BJP's criticism as rank opportunism. 'Whatever they do, we will sing only two stanzas of Vande Mataram. Let them jail us or hang us, we are ready. We are not cowards like the BJP,' he said. He also challenged BJP leaders to prove their patriotism by singing the National Anthem at RSS shakhas, adding there was 'no question of appeasement' in the Congress position. In a pointed aside, he questioned whether BJP members would accept a song by actor and BJP MP Kangana Ranaut as the National Anthem if it were described as such in Parliament.

BJP Accuses Congress of Cultural Disrespect

Karnataka Assembly Deputy Leader of the Opposition and BJP MLA Arvind Bellad rejected the Congress defence, alleging that the CWC decision exposed the party's disconnect from patriotism. 'Congress has not shown respect for the culture of this land. There is no connection between the Congress party and patriotism,' Bellad claimed.

Bellad invoked the freedom struggle, arguing that Vande Mataram had galvanised generations of youth and fighters against colonial rule, and that the Congress was now disregarding its own historical legacy. He further alleged that Sonia Gandhi, the CWC, and the broader Congress leadership had demonstrated through this decision that they 'do not care about Bharat and its culture.' He added that the party's approach to national and cultural issues was among the reasons voters had repeatedly rejected it at the ballot box.

The Broader Political Context

The dispute is not isolated. It feeds into a recurring national debate over the status of Vande Mataram in official and public settings — a debate that has periodically flared between the BJP and Congress since at least the late 1990s. Notably, the Constitution of India designates only the National Anthem ('Jana Gana Mana') as the official anthem, while Vande Mataram holds the status of national song. The question of how many stanzas should be sung has historically divided political opinion.

This comes amid a broader BJP campaign to project Congress as insufficiently nationalist ahead of upcoming electoral cycles, while Congress has consistently argued that its position reflects historical accuracy rather than cultural indifference.

What Happens Next

The CWC decision is unlikely to be reversed in the near term, given the firmness of Hariprasad's remarks. The BJP is expected to continue pressing the issue on the campaign trail, particularly in states where nationalist sentiment carries electoral weight. Whether the row translates into meaningful voter movement or remains a media-cycle exchange will depend on how both sides choose to escalate — or de-escalate — in the days ahead.

Point of View

Including the Kangana Ranaut jibe, suggests it is not merely defending a cultural stance but actively seeking to bait the BJP into a nationalist overreach. The BJP, for its part, has every incentive to keep the issue alive as a proxy for a broader 'Congress versus Bharat' narrative it has deployed successfully in multiple election cycles. What mainstream coverage tends to miss: the Constitution itself does not mandate any particular number of stanzas for the national song, making this a political fight dressed in constitutional clothing.
NationPress
20 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Vande Mataram two-stanza controversy about?
The controversy centres on the Congress Working Committee's decision to sing only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram at party events. The BJP has criticised the move as disrespectful to India's culture and freedom struggle, while Congress argues it reflects the song's original composition by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay in 1875.
Why does Congress say two stanzas are historically correct?
Karnataka Congress President B.K. Hariprasad argued that Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay originally wrote Vande Mataram as a two-stanza poem in 1875, making the CWC's position historically grounded rather than politically motivated. Congress has also denied that the decision amounts to any form of appeasement.
What has the BJP said in response?
BJP MLA Arvind Bellad, the Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Karnataka Assembly, alleged that the CWC decision proved there was 'no connection between the Congress party and patriotism.' He also accused Sonia Gandhi and the CWC of not caring about Bharat and its culture.
What is the legal status of Vande Mataram in India?
Vande Mataram holds the status of India's national song, distinct from the National Anthem, which is 'Jana Gana Mana.' The Constitution does not mandate a specific number of stanzas for the national song, making the debate primarily political rather than legal.
Is this a new controversy?
No. Disputes over Vande Mataram — including how many stanzas should be sung and in what contexts — have periodically surfaced in Indian politics since at least the late 1990s. The current row is a fresh iteration of a long-running ideological contest between the BJP and Congress over nationalist credentials.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 hour ago
  2. 1 hour ago
  3. 2 hours ago
  4. 2 days ago
  5. 4 days ago
  6. 4 days ago
  7. 6 days ago
  8. 3 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google