Lalan Singh slams Congress over Vande Mataram stanza row
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A Congress Working Committee decision to sing only the first two stanzas of Vande Mataram has drawn sharp fire from Union Minister Rajiv Ranjan Singh, who called it proof that the party places vote-bank politics above national commitment — and predicted Congress will keep shrinking as voters see through it.
The 1937 decision that never went away
The fault line is not new. As far back as 1937, the Congress Working Committee resolved to sing only the opening two stanzas of Vande Mataram — a call to accommodate communities that objected to later verses invoking goddess imagery. That decision has never been formally reversed, and it has remained a live grievance in India's culture wars ever since.
Singh's post goes straight at the reasoning. The third stanza, he argues, describes Bharat Mata as a form of divine power; the fourth invokes Maa Durga. His charge: Congress skips those verses deliberately, to appease a specific section of society. 'Their appeasement has risen above love of country — it is unfortunate,' he wrote.
Vande Mataram's place in India's freedom struggle
Vande Mataram — 'I bow to thee, Mother' — was composed by Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay and became the most electrifying anthem of the independence movement. Singh invoked that lineage pointedly: freedom fighters carried the flag on their shoulders singing this song, he said, and it stirred mass awakening across the country.
The Modi government has reinforced the song's standing as the national song with formal legal recognition, a move Singh cited as a direct contrast to Congress's partial adoption. 'PM Narendra Modi's government gave it the status of national song, gave it legal rights, established it — and now they say they won't sing beyond two stanzas,' he said.
Appeasement charge and the BJP's cultural-nationalist playbook
The attack fits a pattern that has defined BJP-Congress exchanges since at least 2014: BJP leaders regularly frame Congress's secular accommodations as minority appeasement at the cost of national symbols, while Congress defends the position as inclusive pluralism. Singh's post adds ministerial weight to that familiar charge.
He closed with a political forecast: 'The public is recognising these people. Congress is shrinking and will keep shrinking.' Whether that prediction holds will be tested in the string of state elections ahead — but the Vande Mataram debate has now been firmly re-injected into the national conversation.