Kerala Governor Mathur's veg-only kitchen row sparks BJP-CPI(M) clash
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A political row erupted on 24 October 2026 over Kerala Governor Om Prakash Mathur's reported decision to make the kitchen at Lok Bhavan — the governor's official residence in Thiruvananthapuram — strictly vegetarian, drawing sharp reactions from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Indian National Congress, and the Communist Party of India (Marxist). The controversy broke on Mathur's first day in office as the 29th Governor of Kerala, with media reports indicating he had directed that non-vegetarian food not be prepared or served in the Lok Bhavan kitchen.
What the Governor's Office Said
Sources in the governor's office clarified that Mathur is a strict vegetarian and issued the instruction on that personal basis. Crucially, they stressed that there was no restriction on the food choices of Lok Bhavan employees — the order reportedly applied only to what is cooked within the official kitchen, not to what staff may eat elsewhere.
BJP Defends the Governor's Right to Choose
Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav came out firmly in Mathur's defence, framing the decision as an exercise of individual liberty. 'Everyone has the freedom to express themselves and to eat and cook what they want. This is part of Indian civilisation and culture. Everyone is free to live according to their own choices, speak their language and practise their religion... Venugopal is trying to unnecessarily target the Lok Bhavan because he has no issue to raise. This is unfortunate,' Yadav said.
BJP MP Praveen Khandelwal echoed the sentiment, directing pointed criticism at All India Congress Committee (AICC) General Secretary K.C. Venugopal. 'Every individual has the right to decide the arrangements for food at their residence. Lok Bhavan is the residence of the Hon'ble Governor, so he has the right to decide what food arrangements will be followed there. Since the Congress has no issues to raise and is a party without any real issues, if K.C. Venugopal turns even a non-issue into an issue, it clearly reflects the disruption and decline in the Congress' political mindset,' Khandelwal said.
CPI(M) and Congress Push Back
CPI(M) MP V. Sivadasan did not mince words in his objection. 'Kerala represents the multicultural character of our nation. India reflects the strength of diversity and the unity that connects us despite our differences. I heard that the Governor of Kerala issued an order allowing only vegetarian food at Lok Bhavan. Everyone has the right to choose their food. How can the Governor direct his employees or staff to consume only vegetarian food? It is a horrible thing,' he said. Notably, Sivadasan's characterisation — that the order extended to staff consumption — appears to contradict the governor's office clarification that no such restriction was placed on employees.
AICC General Secretary K.C. Venugopal had earlier alleged that the governor overstepped by directing that only vegetarian food be prepared in the kitchen, framing it as an imposition on those who work at Lok Bhavan.
Why This Controversy Has a Wider Dimension
The row is not merely about food — it sits at the intersection of gubernatorial authority, individual rights, and Kerala's distinctly pluralist food culture, where non-vegetarian cuisine is deeply embedded across communities. This comes amid a broader pattern of friction between Kerala's Left-led state government and governors appointed by the Centre, a tension that has played out in several southern and eastern states in recent years. Mathur's appointment itself was closely watched given the history of contestation between Raj Bhavan and the state government in Kerala. The speed with which political parties mobilised around a dietary directive on the governor's very first day in office underscores how charged that relationship remains.
What Happens Next
No formal order has been made public by the governor's office, and the controversy rests on media reports and unnamed sourcing. It remains to be seen whether Mathur will publicly clarify the scope of the directive. The episode is likely to feed into ongoing debates about the role and conduct of governors in Opposition-ruled states, a subject that has attracted scrutiny from the Supreme Court in recent years.