Kerala HC questions govt: How can scam accused head 3 PSUs?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Kerala High Court on Thursday, 30 July sharply rebuked the state government for retaining a senior bureaucrat — the prime accused in the alleged ₹600 crore Cashew Development Corporation scam — in three key public sector positions simultaneously. The court questioned how an officer facing criminal trial in a major corruption case could be entrusted with crucial government institutions handling public funds.
What the Court Said
A bench of Justice A. Badhar, hearing a petition filed by public activist K.M. Shajahan, directed the state government to file its response within four weeks. The court orally observed: 'Has the government appointed such a major corruption accused to head three important institutions?' — adding that the posts themselves offered ample scope for corruption.
The bench expressed serious concern over the continued appointment of Dr K.A. Ratheesh — the prime accused in the CBI case — as Secretary of the Kerala Khadi Board, Managing Director of Kerala State Rudronics, and Chief Executive Officer of the Kerala Khadi Workers Welfare Fund Board. The court noted that the allegations against Ratheesh were grave and sought an explanation on how such appointments were justified despite the pending criminal trial.
Background: The ₹600 Crore Scam
The CBI case stems from alleged irregularities in cashew imports during Ratheesh's tenure as Managing Director of the Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation. The state government had itself granted sanction for his prosecution in the case, yet he has continued to occupy senior administrative positions.
The petition further alleged that Ratheesh has served as Managing Director in public sector undertakings for over 11 years, reportedly in violation of the Companies Act, and without the mandatory vigilance clearances.
Pattern of Appointments Under Scrutiny
The High Court's observations come amid renewed scrutiny over successive governments allegedly retaining Ratheesh in influential public sector roles despite corruption charges and repeated judicial interventions. He has also faced additional corruption allegations during his tenures in various state-run enterprises, according to the petition.
Notably, this is not the first time judicial concern has been raised over his continuance — the latest proceedings represent an escalation in pressure on the government to account for a pattern that critics argue reflects institutional disregard for accountability norms.
What Happens Next
With the Kerala High Court signalling its displeasure and seeking a detailed explanation, the government's position on Ratheesh's appointments will now face close judicial scrutiny. The state has been given four weeks to file its reply, after which the court is expected to examine whether the appointments can legally continue given the pending prosecution.