Why Did the Kerala HC Deny the Reinstatement of University Registrar?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Kerala High Court upheld the suspension of Registrar KS Anil Kumar.
- The decision emphasizes the need for a clear ruling from the University's Syndicate.
- The controversy reflects tensions between state authorities and the Governor.
- The use of religious symbols in official events remains a contentious issue.
- Future meetings will determine the outcome of Kumar’s suspension.
Kochi, Sept 10 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court has, on Wednesday, decided against reinstating KS Anil Kumar, the Registrar of Kerala University, who faced suspension after he cancelled a seminar that was set to feature Governor Rajendra V. Arlekar. This decision was made due to the controversy surrounding the display of a Bharat Mata portrait alongside a saffron flag.
The ruling came during the court's consideration of Kumar's appeal regarding his suspension.
Justice TR Ravi stated that the challenge to his suspension was not valid and thus rejected Kumar's appeal.
Additionally, the court instructed the University's Vice-Chancellor to arrange a Syndicate meeting to deliberate on the future of Kumar's suspension.
Following the court's ruling, the Syndicate, which holds a Left majority, resolved to meet with the Vice-Chancellor on Thursday to urge him to call for a Syndicate meeting.
The court remarked, "The challenge against the suspension is unsuccessful. Requests regarding the same are dismissed. The writ petition is resolved by directing the Vice-Chancellor to convene a Syndicate meeting to assess whether the suspension should persist."
This incident traces back to July 2, when Kumar issued a cancellation notice for an event planned at the University Senate Hall, coinciding with the display of the Bharat Mata portrait featuring a saffron flag.
The event had the presence of Kerala Governor Arlekar, who also serves as the Chancellor of the University.
Issuing the cancellation notice while the Governor was already present on stage was interpreted as a sign of disrespect, leading to Kumar's suspension.
While the University Syndicate sought to overturn the suspension on July 6, the Vice-Chancellor declined to endorse this resolution and instead issued further directives confirming Kumar's suspension.
The Vice-Chancellor also restricted him from entering the campus or managing any official files.
Kumar contested these actions, claiming they were an abuse of authority and overreach by the Vice-Chancellor.
During previous court sessions, Justice Ravi noted that the ongoing conflict between the Registrar and the Vice-Chancellor resembled a "cat and mouse game."
On Wednesday, the court chose not to intervene directly but stressed the necessity for the University Syndicate to arrive at a definitive decision regarding the suspension.
This case symbolizes a broader conflict between the State government and the Governor surrounding the use of the Bharat Mata portrait with a saffron flag at official functions, a practice that ministers have opposed, citing its religious connotations.