Karnataka SIR: Priyank Kharge demands ECI answer Congress queries first

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Karnataka SIR: Priyank Kharge demands ECI answer Congress queries first

Synopsis

Karnataka's Home Minister Priyank Kharge has put the Election Commission on notice: answer Congress's written objections — including questions about AI-driven voter deletions and due process — before the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls proceeds. With 8.9 million voters reportedly removed elsewhere under similar exercises, the dispute goes well beyond Karnataka.

Key Takeaways

Priyank Kharge on 29 June demanded the ECI respond to Congress's written objections before commencing the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Karnataka .
Congress submitted eight to ten issues in writing to the Chief Election Commissioner; no response has been received as of Monday.
Key concerns include the definition of 'logical discrepancy' , due process for voter deletions, and the use of AI software in identifying names for removal.
Kharge cited reports that around 8.9 million voters were removed from rolls elsewhere without adequate tribunal access.
The ECI's door-to-door verification drive is scheduled from 29 June to 29 July ; Chief Electoral Officer V.
Anbu Kumar was set to brief the press on 29 June.
Congress has launched a parallel awareness campaign across Karnataka and is examining legal options .

Karnataka Home Minister Priyank Kharge on Monday, 29 June demanded that the Election Commission of India (ECI) address the concerns raised by the Indian National Congress (Congress) before proceeding with the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the state. The revision exercise was set to begin on Tuesday, 29 June, with a door-to-door verification drive scheduled from 29 June to 29 July.

What Kharge Said

Speaking to reporters in Bengaluru, Kharge said the state government would consult Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar and determine the next course of action after reviewing the ECI's response to the party's written objections.

'The Election Commission should first answer the questions raised by Congress regarding the SIR exercise. Only after addressing those concerns should it proceed with the revision of the electoral rolls in Karnataka,' he said.

Kharge confirmed that Congress had already submitted its objections in writing to the Chief Election Commissioner, flagging eight to ten issues related to the exercise. He said no response had been received from either the Election Commission of India or the State Election Commission.

Key Concerns Raised by Congress

Among the issues flagged, Kharge questioned what the ECI means by the term 'logical discrepancy' and on what basis a voter can be removed from the electoral roll. He insisted that any deletion must be preceded by a legal notice, a speaking order, and an opportunity for the voter to present their case before an appropriate tribunal.

'Voters should not lose their franchise merely because of spelling mistakes or minor discrepancies in their names,' he said.

Kharge also raised concerns over the reported use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the revision process, questioning who had audited the software and how it functions. He cited reports that around 8.9 million voters were reportedly removed from electoral rolls elsewhere without adequate opportunity to challenge the decision before a tribunal. He also noted that a retired tribunal judge had reportedly resigned, stating it would take four years to dispose of such cases.

Congress Not Against Revision, But Questions the Method

Kharge was careful to clarify that the Congress was not opposed to the revision of electoral rolls as a constitutional exercise. 'Revising the electoral rolls is the constitutional responsibility of the Election Commission, and preparing a clean and accurate voter list is its duty,' he said.

However, he pointed to concerns about how SIR exercises were conducted in states such as Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal, where there are allegations that vulnerable sections of society were left out of the rolls.

The party has simultaneously launched an awareness campaign across Karnataka, urging its workers to remain vigilant during the voter list revision process.

ECI Preparations Under Way

Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer V. Anbu Kumar was scheduled to address a press conference in Bengaluru on 29 June regarding the SIR exercise. The ECI had completed preparations to launch the drive, which will include a door-to-door verification process running through 29 July.

With Congress examining the legal aspects of the matter and a consultation with the Chief Minister pending, the political standoff over the SIR exercise in Karnataka is likely to intensify in the days ahead.

Point of View

Any perception of voter roll manipulation in a state the party governs is a high-stakes vulnerability. The AI-auditing question is the sharpest edge here: if the ECI cannot publicly explain how its software flags names for deletion, the legitimacy of the entire exercise is open to challenge. The precedent from Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal — where vulnerable communities allegedly lost franchise — gives the objections credibility beyond partisan noise. The ECI's silence so far is itself a governance gap that needs addressing before the drive concludes on 29 July.
NationPress
29 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Karnataka?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is an exercise initiated by the Election Commission of India to update and clean up the electoral rolls in Karnataka. It includes a door-to-door verification drive running from 29 June to 29 July 2025.
Why is Congress objecting to the SIR exercise in Karnataka?
Congress has raised eight to ten written objections to the Chief Election Commissioner, questioning the definition of 'logical discrepancy', due process for voter deletions, and the use of AI software to identify names for removal. The party says it has received no response from the ECI so far.
What did Priyank Kharge say about AI use in the voter revision process?
Kharge questioned who audited the AI software being reportedly used to identify and remove names from the voter list, and how it functions. He cited reports that around 8.9 million voters were removed from rolls elsewhere without adequate opportunity to challenge the decision before a tribunal.
Is Congress opposed to revising the electoral rolls?
No. Kharge explicitly stated that Congress is not opposed to electoral roll revision, calling it the constitutional responsibility of the Election Commission. The party's objection is to the manner in which the exercise is being conducted, not the exercise itself.
What happens next in the Karnataka SIR dispute?
Kharge said the state government will consult Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar to decide the next course of action after reviewing the ECI's response. Congress is also examining the legal aspects of the issue alongside its awareness campaign across the state.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 days ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 6 months ago
  4. 6 months ago
  5. 7 months ago
  6. 9 months ago
  7. 9 months ago
  8. 10 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google