Are CM Vijayan and Cong leader Muraleedharan Right to Slam the Centre for 'Insulting' Gandhi and 'Glorifying' RSS?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Kerala's CM Pinarayi Vijayan and Congress leader K. Muraleedharan have strongly criticized the Modi government for allegedly distorting history and undermining Mahatma Gandhi's legacy. This article delves into their concerns and the implications of recent actions taken by the government, emphasizing the need to uphold Gandhi's ideals in modern politics.
Key Takeaways
- CM Vijayan and Muraleedharan criticize the Modi government for historical distortion.
- The government released a postal stamp and coin for the RSS centenary.
- This action is viewed as an insult to Gandhi's legacy.
- Gandhi's ideals are positioned as a counter to divisive politics.
- The fight against communalism remains critical for India's future.
Thiruvananthapuram, Oct 2 (NationPress) Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and prominent Congress figure K. Muraleedharan have openly condemned the Modi administration, alleging it is engaged in a deliberate effort to misrepresent history and diminish the legacy of Mahatma Gandhi.
In a vehement Facebook post, CM Vijayan emphasized that Gandhi dedicated his life to a universal message and was assassinated by a Hindutva extremist because he staunchly upheld the principles of democracy and secularism.
He stated, "Gandhi and his principles obstructed divisive politics, which incited communal factions." The Chief Minister criticized the government for issuing a postal stamp and coin commemorating the centenary of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), an organization that faced a ban following Gandhi's assassination.
He termed this action an "affront to the Constitution", arguing that the timing of their release, coinciding with Gandhi Jayanti, indicates that "even the memory of Gandhi disturbs the Sangh Parivar."
Furthermore, he accused the government of persistently attempting to elevate V.D. Savarkar, who was implicated in Gandhi's assassination, as a national icon.
"This endeavor to replace Gandhi with Savarkar is a perilous misrepresentation that secular society must oppose," CM Vijayan cautioned.
In a show of solidarity, Muraleedharan affirmed that the Modi administration's attempts to downplay Gandhi would be resisted and ultimately overcome.
During the inauguration of a Gandhi Darshan event in Thiruvananthapuram on Thursday, Muraleedharan criticized the release of a Rs 100 coin featuring the RSS stamp as "shameful".
"Those who allied with the British during our struggle for independence lack the moral authority to dictate the future of this nation," he asserted.
Muraleedharan accused the RSS of attempting to alter history to fit its ideological narrative and warned that such actions directly threaten India's democratic and secular foundations.
Both leaders utilized Gandhi Jayanti to highlight the ongoing battle against communalism and historical revisionism, asserting that Gandhi's vision of pluralism serves as the genuine remedy for divisive politics.
Point of View
It's imperative to recognize the significance of maintaining historical integrity. The criticisms voiced by CM Vijayan and Muraleedharan reflect a broader concern among many citizens regarding the portrayal of historical figures. Upholding the principles of democracy and secularism that Gandhi championed is essential for navigating contemporary challenges.
NationPress
02/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did CM Vijayan say about Gandhi?
CM Vijayan emphasized that Gandhi's life represented a universal message and criticized the government for undermining his legacy.
Why did Muraleedharan criticize the Modi government?
Muraleedharan condemned the government's actions as attempts to belittle Gandhi and distort historical narratives.
What was the significance of Gandhi Jayanti in this context?
Gandhi Jayanti served as a backdrop for both leaders to highlight the ongoing struggle against communalism and historical revisionism.
What are the implications of the government's actions?
The government's actions could potentially threaten India's democratic and secular foundations, as warned by both leaders.
How does this relate to current political dynamics?
The criticisms reflect a growing concern about the distortion of historical narratives in contemporary political discourse.
