Union Education Minister Takes Action on NCERT Textbook's Judicial Content Amid Controversy
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Jamshedpur, Feb 26 (NationPress) The Union Education Minister, Dharmendra Pradhan, publicly expressed his profound regret regarding a contentious chapter concerning the judiciary found in a Class 8 social science textbook released by the National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT). He announced that all existing printed copies would be immediately recalled.
During a media briefing in Jamshedpur, he emphasized that the government views this issue with utmost seriousness. “We have resolved to withdraw all printed editions right away,” he stated.
Pradhan highlighted that the judiciary serves as a crucial pillar of Indian democracy and that safeguarding its integrity is a primary obligation of the government.
“Citizens have steadfast trust in the judiciary. We will not permit the reputation of any constitutional body to be compromised,” he asserted.
He further noted that once the issue was identified, directives were promptly issued to the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), and the recall process was initiated without hesitation. An extensive investigation has also been launched to assess the nature and scope of the error.
“If any official or individual is found to have acted negligently, suitable measures will be executed in accordance with the law,” Pradhan added.
He reassured that the pre-publication review and editorial protocols would be reinforced to avert similar oversights in the future. The NCERT has also publicly conveyed its regret over this matter, he stated.
In the meantime, the Supreme Court of India has taken significant notice of the controversy. On Thursday, the apex court raised objections to mentions of “corruption in the judiciary” within the Class 8 textbook and issued a show-cause notice to the Secretary of School Education in the Ministry of Education as well as the Director of NCERT.
The court requested an explanation regarding why action should not be initiated against them under the Contempt of Court Act or other relevant laws.
Additionally, a complete prohibition on the publication, reprinting, and digital distribution of the book containing the disputed material has been enforced.
In preliminary remarks, a bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant indicated that if the material was found to have been published with the intent to tarnish the image of the judiciary, it could constitute criminal contempt.