Why is a PIL Filed in Calcutta HC for 'The Bengal Files' Screening?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
A public interest litigation has been filed in Calcutta High Court to ensure the peaceful screening of 'The Bengal Files' in West Bengal. This case raises questions about censorship and the rights of citizens to view certified films. As tensions rise, the court's decision could redefine film screening norms in the region.
Key Takeaways
- PIL filed in Calcutta HC seeks intervention for film screening.
- Unofficial ban on 'The Bengal Files' in West Bengal.
- Petitioner argues for fundamental rights to view certified films.
- Court's decision could reshape cinema freedom in the region.
- Previous petition dismissed for lack of evidence.
Kolkata, Sep 16 (NationPress) A public interest litigation (PIL) was submitted on Tuesday at the Calcutta High Court, requesting the court's intervention to guarantee a smooth and peaceful screening of the Vivek Agnihotri-directed 'The Bengal Files' in cinema halls and multiplexes across West Bengal.
Currently, there exists an unofficial ban on the showing of 'The Bengal Files' in West Bengal, where cinema hall and multiplex owners have refused to allocate screening slots for the film, reportedly due to pressure from a specific political organization.
On Tuesday, Sayan Kangsabani, a resident of Nadia district in West Bengal, filed the PIL questioning why a film, which has been approved by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), should encounter such obstacles in its screening within a state.
The petitioner contended that the right to view any CBFC-certified film without obstruction is a fundamental right for every Indian citizen in all states, and any denial of this right constitutes a violation of their fundamental freedoms.
Kangsabani further argued that since 'The Bengal Files' is being screened freely in other states, there is no justification for its absence from West Bengal.
The PIL has been accepted, and a hearing is anticipated to take place later this week.
Earlier this month, a petition against the screening of 'The Bengal Files' was dismissed by a single-judge bench led by Justice Amrita Sinha, as the petitioner could not substantiate their claims with adequate evidence.
The petition was filed by Santanu Mukherjee, the grandson of freedom fighter Gopal Mukherjee, who is depicted in the film.
Justice Sinha clarified that such petitions fall outside her court's jurisdiction and advised the petitioner to seek the appropriate forum for resolution.
'The Bengal Files' is considered the third installment of the 'Files' trilogy, following 'The Tashkent Files' in 2019 and the highly controversial 'The Kashmir Files' in 2022.
Previously, the Mamata Banerjee-led government in West Bengal faced accusations of imposing gag orders on other films for purportedly flimsy reasons, including the film 'The Kerala Story' directed by Sudipto Sen.
Point of View
It is essential to recognize the delicate balance between political influence and artistic freedom. This situation underscores the fundamental rights of citizens to access content that has received official clearance. Upholding these rights is pivotal for the integrity of our democratic framework.
NationPress
21/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is 'The Bengal Files' about?
The Bengal Files is a film directed by Vivek Agnihotri, forming part of the 'Files' trilogy, which explores significant historical and political events.
What issues does the PIL address?
The PIL addresses the challenges faced in screening 'The Bengal Files' in West Bengal, emphasizing the right of citizens to view CBFC-certified films.
What was the outcome of the previous petition?
The previous petition against the screening was dismissed by Justice Amrita Sinha for lack of substantiated claims.
How does this case reflect on film censorship?
This case highlights ongoing concerns about film censorship in India, particularly regarding political influences on artistic expression.
What could be the implications of the court's decision?
The court's ruling may set a precedent for how films are screened in politically sensitive environments and could impact future cinematic releases.
