Are irregularities in the CM women’s employment scheme being used for vote-buying?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Patna witnesses political turmoil as the RJD accuses the state government of misusing the Mukhyamantri Mahila Rojgar Yojana for electoral gains. With serious allegations of misdirected funds and calls for accountability, the controversy raises questions about the integrity of government schemes.
Key Takeaways
- Concerns raised by RJD about fund misallocation.
- Allegations of vote-buying linked to government schemes.
- Official letters provided as evidence by RJD.
- JDU’s defense points out minor errors in implementation.
- Public sentiment and political implications examined.
Patna, Dec 13 (NationPress) The Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) has raised serious concerns, alleging that the Mukhyamantri Mahila Rojgar Yojana was exploited for vote manipulation during recent elections.
The party contends that funds intended for women were incorrectly deposited into men’s bank accounts, undermining the purpose of the scheme. They are demanding accountability from the state government, presenting official correspondence as proof of their claims.
One such letter, from the Block Project Officer (BPO) of Jale block in Darbhanga district, was addressed to Fekan Paswan of Brahmpur West Panchayat, indicating that Rs 10,000 was erroneously transferred to his account under the Chief Minister’s Women’s Employment Scheme. The letter requests the immediate return of these funds.
Similarly, another letter notified Nitish Kumar of Ahiyari Panchayat that Rs 10,000 meant for the women-centric initiative had been mistakenly credited to his account, urging him to return it as soon as possible.
In response, the Janata Dal (United) [JDU] has dismissed the RJD's allegations, asserting that Lalu Prasad Yadav’s party is engaging in unnecessary politicization.
JDU spokesperson Abhishek Jha stated that minor errors are inevitable in the execution of extensive government programs, which are generally rectified with appropriate actions taken when necessary. He emphasized that the people of Bihar have effectively rejected the RJD, suggesting that they are trying to stir controversy to regain political relevance.
“The public is well aware of the situation,” he asserted.
This controversy has escalated politically, with the RJD reasserting its claims on the social media platform X, accusing the NDA government of rushing to secure votes.
The RJD pointed out that the ruling alliance’s “anxiety and insecurity” led to these significant errors, resulting in funds meant for women being redirected into men’s accounts. They further claimed that the government is now reaching out to men to recover the Rs 10,000.
Citing the rising issues of inflation, unemployment, and migration in Bihar, the RJD questioned how the government expected to retrieve the funds, arguing that the money has likely already been spent. They reiterated their allegations of electoral manipulation, vote-buying, and rigging.
Point of View
It is crucial to approach this issue with an unbiased lens, recognizing the complexities of political allegations. While the RJD has raised significant concerns regarding the CM's women’s employment scheme, the counterarguments from the JDU highlight the potential for miscommunication in large-scale implementations. It is vital to investigate these claims thoroughly to uphold democratic integrity.
NationPress
14/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Mukhyamantri Mahila Rojgar Yojana?
The Mukhyamantri Mahila Rojgar Yojana is a government initiative aimed at promoting women's employment and empowerment in Bihar.
Why is the RJD accusing the government?
The RJD alleges that the scheme funds were misappropriated and transferred to men's accounts instead of women’s, suggesting an attempt at vote-buying.
What evidence does the RJD present?
The RJD has provided official letters from Block Project Officers as evidence of funds being incorrectly credited to men's accounts.
How has the JDU responded to these allegations?
The JDU has dismissed the allegations as politicization of minor errors that can occur in large-scale government schemes.
What are the broader implications of these allegations?
These allegations could undermine public trust in governmental initiatives and raise questions about electoral integrity.
