Did Rupali Ganguly Praise the Makers of 'Border-2' for Excluding Diljit Dosanjh?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Rupali Ganguly has publicly supported the filmmakers of 'Border 2' for potentially removing Diljit Dosanjh, amidst calls for a boycott by FWICE. This move has sparked discussions about national pride and responsibilities in the film industry.
Key Takeaways
- Rupali Ganguly supports the exclusion of Diljit Dosanjh from 'Border 2'.
- The decision is influenced by calls from FWICE to boycott him.
- National sentiment is a crucial factor in film production.
- 'Border 2' aims to reflect national pride.
- Actors face scrutiny over their collaborations amidst tensions.
Mumbai, June 27 (NationPress) In light of a request from the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) to boycott Diljit Dosanjh, it has come to light that the Punjabi actor and singer may no longer be part of the upcoming sequel 'Border 2'.
While an official announcement is still pending, acclaimed television star Rupali Ganguly has expressed her support for the filmmakers' decision.
On her X (formerly known as Twitter) account, the 'Anupamaa' actress shared, "Border was a movie that stirred profound patriotism among our citizens. It’s incredibly disheartening to see an actor in #Border2 who does not acknowledge his responsibilities towards our nation."
Commending the 'Border 2' producers, she added, "Hats off to the filmmakers for demonstrating clarity and conviction by removing that actor from the project. A film that honors our soldiers and national pride must reflect that ethos in every element. There is no place for divided loyalties in a film centered on national pride. JAI HIND 🇮🇳"
Reports suggest that FWICE sent a letter to Bhushan Kumar, JP Dutta, Nidhi Dutta, and Anurag Singh, urging them to replace Diljit in 'Border 2'.
"The Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE), representing the backbone of the Indian film and television industry, is very disappointed and concerned regarding the casting of actor-singer Mr. Diljit Dosanjh in your forthcoming film Border 2 produced under the banner of JP Films in collaboration with T-Series and directed by Anurag Singh. By opting to work with an artist who has blatantly disregarded the current tensions and national sentiment, your production undermines the solidarity shown by the Indian film industry towards the nation," a segment of the letter stated.
Diljit has encountered considerable backlash since the trailer release of his movie, 'Sardaar Ji 3', which features Pakistani actress Hania Aamir.
Critics have slammed him for collaborating with a Pakistani actor amid ongoing tensions between the two nations following the tragic Pahalgam attack.
Point of View
The actions taken by Rupali Ganguly and FWICE emphasize the importance of aligning film projects with national sentiment, especially in times of geopolitical tension. The decision to potentially exclude Diljit Dosanjh is seen as a commitment to uphold national pride within the cinematic narrative.
NationPress
27/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why was Diljit Dosanjh removed from 'Border 2'?
Diljit Dosanjh's removal from 'Border 2' was influenced by a request from the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) to boycott him due to concerns over his collaboration with a Pakistani actress amid national tensions.
What is Rupali Ganguly's stance on this issue?
Rupali Ganguly has supported the makers of 'Border 2' for their decision to potentially drop Diljit Dosanjh, emphasizing the need for films to reflect national pride and responsibilities.
What does FWICE stand for?
FWICE stands for the Federation of Western India Cine Employees, which represents the core workforce in the Indian film and television industry.
What is 'Border 2' about?
'Border 2' is a sequel to the original 'Border' film that celebrated the valor of Indian soldiers and national pride.
Why are some actors facing backlash in India?
Actors are facing backlash for perceived disloyalty or actions that are seen as insensitive to national sentiments, especially in light of geopolitical tensions.
