Kaziranga ESZ row: Assam CM Sarma fires back at Congress, backs locals
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Wednesday, 2 September launched a blistering counter-offensive against the Congress over its campaign opposing proposed changes to the Eco-Sensitive Zone (ESZ) around Kaziranga National Park, asserting that the protection of the UNESCO World Heritage Site cannot be achieved through social media activism or street protests. The remarks sharply escalated the political standoff between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led Assam government and the opposition over one of India's most iconic wildlife sanctuaries.
Sarma's Direct Attack on Gaurav Gogoi
Targeting Assam Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC) president and Congress leader Gaurav Gogoi by name, Sarma was unsparing in his criticism. 'Gaurav Gogoi cannot protect Kaziranga. Kaziranga's protection will not happen on Instagram. The local people will have to protect Kaziranga,' the Chief Minister said, dismissing the Congress MP's campaign as performative.
Sarma went further, arguing that the Congress has no moral standing to raise the Kaziranga issue. 'If there is no shame and no clothes, let Congress speak,' he said in a strongly worded remark, adding that there was no reason for the Congress to feel embarrassed about raising the issue — a pointed, if cryptic, rhetorical flourish aimed at the party's credibility on environmental governance.
What the ESZ Dispute Is About
At the heart of the controversy is the Assam government's proposal to reduce the existing 10-km ESZ framework around Kaziranga to a significantly smaller buffer — reportedly ranging from 1 km to 3 km in different areas. The Centre's ESZ guidelines, which apply to protected areas across India, are intended to restrict commercial and developmental activity in zones adjacent to national parks and wildlife sanctuaries.
The Congress has strongly opposed the reduction, arguing it would weaken environmental safeguards and open the surrounding ecosystem to greater developmental and commercial pressure. Gogoi led a protest at Kohora in August, demanding the proposal be withdrawn. He has also raised concerns over alleged illegal mining in areas connected to the Kaziranga landscape and questioned the composition of the State Wildlife Board.
Local Communities Back the Government
Notably, the political battle has a significant community dimension. Several groups and residents living around Kaziranga have backed the state government's position, arguing that communities dependent on land near the national park must have a greater say in determining the ESZ boundary. Residents in the region have held their own meetings and counter-protests opposing the Congress' demand for a wider buffer zone.
Sarma has leaned into this local support, framing the government's position not as an anti-conservation stance but as a community-first approach to wildlife management — a framing the Congress contests.
Congress Widens Its Agitation
The Congress has expanded its campaign beyond Kaziranga. On 29 August, the party organised statewide protests and padayatras across several districts — including Sonitpur, Lakhimpur, Tinsukia, Karbi Anglong, and Golaghat — demanding a rollback of the proposed ESZ reduction. Gogoi has argued that environmental concerns and mining-related issues must be addressed before any boundary changes are made.
The dispute has evolved into a broader political contest over conservation, development rights, and the role of local communities — one that is unlikely to be resolved before the ESZ proposal reaches a formal regulatory stage. Sarma's latest remarks are expected to further harden positions on both sides ahead of any government decision on the matter.