Shaina NC slams Digvijaya Singh's Sanatan Dharma remarks, targets Congress 'pseudo-secularism'

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Shaina NC slams Digvijaya Singh's Sanatan Dharma remarks, targets Congress 'pseudo-secularism'

Synopsis

Digvijaya Singh's attempt to distinguish Sanatan Dharma from Hinduism — and his Quran reference in the same breath — has handed the BJP a ready-made cultural flashpoint. Shiv Sena's Shaina NC and MP minister Vishwas Sarang piled on, with Sarang making an unsubstantiated Zakir Naik allegation that is likely to dominate headlines far longer than Singh's original remarks.

Key Takeaways

Shiv Sena leader Shaina NC on 26 October accused the Congress of 'pseudo-secularism' over Digvijaya Singh's Sanatan Dharma remarks.
Digvijaya Singh had claimed at a press conference that he believes in Sanatan Dharma but argued that 'Hinduism' was a term coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar .
Madhya Pradesh Minister Vishwas Sarang alleged, without evidence, that fugitive preacher Zakir Naik was sponsoring Singh's political rally.
Zakir Naik faces multiple pending cases in India including money laundering, hate speech, and incitement of communal hatred.
The row is the latest in a series of political controversies over the framing of Hindu religious identity ahead of state elections.

Shiv Sena leader Shaina NC on Monday, 26 October launched a sharp attack on Congress leader Digvijaya Singh over his recent remarks on Sanatan Dharma, accusing the Congress of practising 'pseudo-secularism' purely for electoral advantage. The remarks add to a growing political storm around Singh's public statements on religion and identity.

What Shaina NC Said

Speaking to reporters, Shaina NC directly targeted Singh's admission that he believes in Sanatan Dharma, framing it as an example of the Congress's contradictory stance on religion. 'Digvijaya Singh admitted that he believes in Sanatan Dharma. This party believes in pseudo-secularism. It is for votes. They will continue to appease people for votes,' she said.

She further questioned the consistency of Singh's public positions, adding: 'If we go into the history of his statements, we will be able to decipher the confusion and duality he goes through.'

What Triggered the Row

The controversy stems from a press conference in which Digvijaya Singh said he personally believes in Sanatan Dharma but distinguished it sharply from Hinduism. He claimed the term 'Hinduism' was coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and argued that Hinduism, as framed by Savarkar, had no connection with equality. Singh described Sanatan Dharma as rooted in 'love, affection and empathy' — values he said his mother had imparted to him.

Singh also reportedly drew from his reading of the Holy Quran, offering his interpretation of the term 'kafir' during the same address — a move that further intensified the backlash from Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders.

Madhya Pradesh Minister Joins the Attack

Madhya Pradesh Minister Vishwas Sarang escalated the rhetoric, questioning the intent behind Singh's proposed rally and accusing him of repeatedly stoking controversies over religious issues. 'Is he taking out this rally to insult and tarnish Hindus and Sanatan? What is his objective?' Sarang asked.

Sarang further alleged, without presenting supporting evidence, that fugitive Islamic preacher Zakir Naik was backing Singh's political campaign. 'I will clearly blame Zakir Naik for this. Digvijay Singh's Yatra is sponsored by Zakir Naik. He is writing a script every day, and Digvijay Singh is insulting Hinduism,' Sarang alleged.

Naik, an Islamic preacher who left India, faces multiple pending cases in the country, including allegations related to money laundering, hate speech, and incitement of communal hatred. Authorities have also accused him of involvement in activities linked to extremism. Sarang's allegation directly connecting Naik to Singh's rally was not accompanied by any documentary proof.

The Broader Political Context

The exchange is the latest episode in an ongoing battle over the framing of Hindu identity and religious vocabulary ahead of several state elections. Sanatan Dharma has repeatedly emerged as a flashpoint — most recently when Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M K Stalin's son made remarks that drew nationwide controversy. Critics argue that both the ruling party and the opposition use religious framing strategically, while supporters of each side accuse the other of cynicism. Notably, Singh's remarks are being closely parsed in Madhya Pradesh, a state where BJP has historically leveraged Hindutva sentiment as a core electoral plank.

Point of View

But the execution has handed political rivals a sustained attack line. The attempt to separate Sanatan Dharma from Hinduism — while simultaneously referencing the Quran — is the kind of compound statement that collapses under the weight of its own ambition in a polarised news cycle. More troubling is Vishwas Sarang's unsubstantiated allegation linking Singh to Zakir Naik: allegations without evidence, once lodged on national television, have a way of outliving any fact-check. What both sides are really doing is competing for ownership of Hindu identity ahead of elections — and Singh's statement, whatever its scholarly intent, has put the Congress on the defensive in precisely the terrain the BJP prefers to fight on.
NationPress
26 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Digvijaya Singh say about Sanatan Dharma that caused the controversy?
Digvijaya Singh said at a press conference that he personally believes in Sanatan Dharma but distinguished it from Hinduism, claiming the term 'Hinduism' was coined by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and had no connection with equality. He described Sanatan Dharma as rooted in love, affection and empathy, and also referenced his reading of the Quran in the same address.
Why did Shaina NC criticise the Congress over these remarks?
Shiv Sena leader Shaina NC said Singh's admission that he believes in Sanatan Dharma exposed what she called the Congress's 'pseudo-secularism' — a stance she argued the party adopts purely to secure votes. She also questioned the consistency of Singh's public statements on religion over the years.
What did Madhya Pradesh Minister Vishwas Sarang allege about Digvijaya Singh?
Vishwas Sarang alleged, without presenting evidence, that fugitive Islamic preacher Zakir Naik was sponsoring Singh's political rally and effectively scripting his remarks. He accused Singh of insulting Sanatan Dharma and Hinduism through his statements and political activities.
Who is Zakir Naik and why is he significant in this context?
Zakir Naik is an Islamic preacher who left India and faces multiple pending cases including allegations of money laundering, hate speech, and incitement of communal hatred. He was invoked by Minister Sarang in an unsubstantiated allegation linking him to Singh's rally.
How does this row fit into the broader political landscape?
The dispute is part of a recurring pattern of political battles over the framing of Hindu religious identity, particularly ahead of state elections. Similar controversies over Sanatan Dharma surfaced nationally in 2023 following remarks by Tamil Nadu's ruling party, and the term has remained a politically charged flashpoint since.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. 3 days ago
  3. 3 weeks ago
  4. 3 weeks ago
  5. 4 weeks ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 10 months ago
  8. 12 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google