Manickam Tagore opposes 'media trial' of TVK MLA Arul Vignesh in obscene messages row

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Manickam Tagore opposes 'media trial' of TVK MLA Arul Vignesh in obscene messages row

Synopsis

Tamil Nadu Congress chief Manickam Tagore has broken ranks with his own party MPs to defend due process for TVK MLA Arul Vignesh, accused of sending obscene messages to a woman Collector — exposing a sharp internal divide within the Congress over how to handle one of Tamil Nadu's most politically charged controversies right now.

Key Takeaways

Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president Manickam Tagore cautioned against a 'media trial' of TVK MLA Arul Vignesh on 11 November 2026 .
Arul Vignesh has denied sending obscene messages to the Kallakurichi woman Collector and has requested examination of CCTV footage and his mobile phone .
Tagore rejected equivalence between the MLA's denied allegation and Udhayanidhi Stalin 's publicly recorded remarks at a meeting before 2,000 people in Thanjavur .
Tagore said police must act on the Deputy Speaker assault allegation if a formal complaint has been filed.
Congress MPs Jothimani and Sudha had previously criticised Arul Vignesh, revealing a split within the party over the controversy.

Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president Manickam Tagore on 11 November 2026 urged caution against declaring Kallakurichi TVK MLA Arul Vignesh guilty before a proper examination of allegations that he sent obscene messages to the district's woman Collector. Speaking at a press conference in Chennai, Tagore said the MLA's denial of wrongdoing must be weighed before conclusions are drawn.

Tagore's Defence of Due Process

Tagore questioned what he termed a 'media trial' of Arul Vignesh, noting that the MLA had denied the allegations and had himself requested scrutiny of CCTV footage and his mobile phone. 'The MLA has explained. He has asked for CCTV footage to be examined and his phone to be checked. When he denies the allegations, how is it fair to speak as though his guilt has already been established?' Tagore said.

He emphasised that his position was not a defence of any individual but a principled objection to premature declarations of guilt — insisting that the MLA's explanation deserved examination before any judgement was passed.

On the Collector's Alleged Complaint

When asked about reports that the Collector had lodged a complaint with the Chief Secretary, Tagore sought specific details of the purported complaint and urged journalists to place the relevant information in the public domain. He pointed out that routine administrative communication between Collectors and the Chief Secretary was standard practice and could not by itself establish the nature or seriousness of a complaint against any individual.

Separating the Udhayanidhi Controversy

Tagore firmly rejected attempts to draw a parallel between the allegations against Arul Vignesh and remarks made by Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader Udhayanidhi Stalin at a public meeting in Thanjavur. He condemned Udhayanidhi's remarks about a woman as offensive and unacceptable, noting they were delivered publicly before approximately 2,000 people and were captured on video. A publicly recorded speech and a denied allegation, he argued, were not equivalent and should not be conflated to cast collective guilt.

Deputy Speaker Assault Allegation

Addressing a separate allegation of assault involving the Deputy Speaker, Tagore said police must act if the alleged victim had filed a formal complaint. 'Whoever the victim may be, police must act on a complaint. There is no difference of opinion on that,' he said. He stressed that the two separate incidents should be examined on their own merits and not bundled together.

Divided Response Within Congress

Tagore's remarks come amid a visible split within the Indian National Congress (INC) over the controversy. Congress MPs Jothimani and Sudha had earlier strongly criticised Arul Vignesh over the alleged obscene messages, placing themselves at odds with Tagore's more measured stance. Notably, the divergence highlights the delicate balancing act for the Congress in Tamil Nadu, where it maintains an alliance with the ruling DMK even as the TVK — the party to which Arul Vignesh belongs — occupies a distinct political space. How the Congress navigates this internal difference will likely shape its credibility on women's safety issues ahead of future electoral contests.

Point of View

And a full-throated attack on a TVK MLA would carry collateral risk. Yet his position sits awkwardly alongside the sharp criticism from his own party's MPs, Jothimani and Sudha, who have been vocal on the alleged obscene messages. The Congress is now publicly divided on a women's safety issue, which carries its own credibility cost. The more significant undercurrent is the contrast Tagore draws with Udhayanidhi Stalin's Thanjavur remarks — condemning one while urging restraint on the other risks being read as selective outrage, however procedurally defensible his argument may be.
NationPress
11 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the allegations against TVK MLA Arul Vignesh?
TVK MLA Arul Vignesh from Kallakurichi is alleged to have sent obscene messages to the district's woman Collector. The MLA has denied the allegations and has asked for CCTV footage and his mobile phone to be examined. Reports also indicate that the Collector raised the matter with the Chief Secretary.
Why did Manickam Tagore oppose calling the MLA guilty?
Tagore argued that the MLA's denial must be taken into account before any conclusion is drawn, and that treating him as guilty before evidence is examined amounts to a 'media trial'. He stressed his position was a defence of due process, not of the individual.
How is Congress divided over this controversy?
Congress MPs Jothimani and Sudha have strongly criticised Arul Vignesh over the alleged obscene messages, while Tamil Nadu Congress Committee president Manickam Tagore has urged restraint and due process. The divergence reveals differing positions within the party on how to handle the case.
What did Tagore say about Udhayanidhi Stalin's remarks?
Tagore condemned DMK leader Udhayanidhi Stalin's remarks about a woman at a public meeting in Thanjavur as offensive and unacceptable. He distinguished those remarks — publicly delivered before around 2,000 people and captured on video — from an allegation that the accused had denied, arguing the two situations were not comparable.
What did Tagore say about the Deputy Speaker assault allegation?
Tagore said police must take appropriate action on the Deputy Speaker assault allegation if a formal complaint has been filed, adding that there was no difference of opinion on the need for police to act on any victim's complaint.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 8 hours ago
  2. Yesterday
  3. 4 weeks ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 4 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google