Ram Kripal Yadav Declares No-Confidence Motion Against LS Speaker Om Birla Was Always Doomed to Fail

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ram Kripal Yadav Declares No-Confidence Motion Against LS Speaker Om Birla Was Always Doomed to Fail

Synopsis

Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav criticized the Congress for the no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, calling it a reflection of declining political standards. Yadav argued that such actions undermine respect for constitutional positions and highlighted the rarity of such motions in India's parliamentary history.

Key Takeaways

No-confidence motion against Om Birla was rejected.
Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav condemned the opposition's actions.
The Congress party faces criticism for declining political standards.
Historical precedent shows such motions are uncommon.
The integrity of parliamentary institutions is at stake.

Patna, March 12 (NationPress) Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav stated on Thursday that the no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla was predetermined to fail, while he sharply criticized the opposition, especially the Congress party, for what he termed a "decline in political standards."

In response to the motion's dismissal, Yadav expressed that the outcome was anticipated right from the start.

“It was already evident that this would occur. The motion initiated against the Speaker by the Congress party and other opposition members was destined to fail. This highlights a notable decline in political decorum, particularly as the Congress has regressed significantly,” he conveyed to IANS.

Yadav further questioned the rationale behind submitting such a motion, fully aware of the potential outcome.

“You are already aware of what the result will be, yet you move forward with such an action. What is your intention here? A person in a constitutional role deserves respect, no matter their previous party affiliation,” Yadav stated.

He recalled that instances of such actions against the Speaker are rare in India’s parliamentary history.

“To the best of my knowledge, there was a no-confidence motion against the first Lok Sabha Speaker, G.V. Mavalankar. Aside from that, I cannot recall any similar motion being brought against a Speaker. The opposition has not attempted such actions in the past,” he remarked.

Yadav contended that differences with the Speaker should not result in extreme measures like a no-confidence motion.

“Disagreements can exist within Parliament, but why target the Speaker in this manner? What offense has he committed? Has he conspired in any way? The Speaker makes decisions based on his judgment. The House has now rejected the motion, and similar outcomes will occur if such attempts are made again,” he added.

The Lok Sabha dismissed the no-confidence motion against Speaker Om Birla through a voice vote after nearly 13 hours of discussion. Opposition parties had moved the motion, alleging that the Speaker had failed to maintain the impartiality of the House.

The government strongly refuted these claims during the debate.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah defended the Speaker and condemned the opposition’s initiative, labeling it a regrettable decision in parliamentary politics.

“The Speaker of the Lok Sabha represents not just one party but the entire House, safeguarding the rights of all members. Proposing a no-confidence motion against the Speaker cannot be deemed a courageous act,” HM Shah stated.

He emphasized that members from both the treasury and opposition benches participated in the discussions prior to the motion's rejection.

“This is not a common occurrence. A no-confidence motion against a Speaker has not happened in nearly four decades,” the Home Minister noted.

HM Shah also underscored that questioning the Speaker’s integrity poses broader implications for democratic institutions.

“The Lok Sabha stands as India’s largest democratic forum, holding credibility both domestically and internationally. When the integrity of its leader is put into question, it casts doubt on our democratic processes,” he concluded.

Point of View

Declared futile by Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav, raises significant concerns about the state of political ethics in India. As the opposition parties struggle to maintain their footing, the respect for constitutional roles appears to be at stake, prompting a critical evaluation of their strategies.
NationPress
29 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the outcome of the no-confidence motion against Om Birla?
The Lok Sabha rejected the no-confidence motion against Speaker Om Birla through a voice vote after extensive debate.
Who criticized the opposition's actions regarding the motion?
Bihar Minister Ram Kripal Yadav sharply criticized the opposition, particularly the Congress party, for initiating the motion.
How did Amit Shah respond to the no-confidence motion?
Union Home Minister Amit Shah defended the Speaker and labeled the motion as a regrettable action in parliamentary politics.
What historical context did Yadav provide regarding no-confidence motions?
Yadav noted that no-confidence motions against Speakers are rare, recalling only one instance against the first Lok Sabha Speaker, G.V. Mavalankar.
What concerns did Shah raise about questioning the Speaker's integrity?
Shah emphasized that questioning the Speaker's integrity jeopardizes the credibility of India's democratic institutions.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 months ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 4 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 4 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google