Mahavitaran privatisation ruled out; Bhiwandi franchise cut losses to 10%: Fadnavis
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Maharashtra Chief Minister and Energy Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Tuesday, 30 June told the State Assembly that the state government has no intention of privatising Mahavitaran (Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited), firmly defending the distribution franchise model as a targeted operational tool rather than an asset sale.
What Fadnavis Said in the Assembly
Responding to a query raised by member Rais Shaikh during the Question Hour, Chief Minister Fadnavis provided a detailed defence of the franchise arrangement, particularly the Bhiwandi Circle managed by Torrent Power Limited. He argued that bringing in private franchisees in high-loss zones is a precision intervention, not a structural privatisation of the public utility.
'Introducing localised distribution franchises to upgrade operational networks and stop revenue leakage does not equate to selling state assets. Mahavitaran continues to be a robust, state-managed enterprise,' Fadnavis asserted in the House.
Bhiwandi Turnaround: The Numbers
The Chief Minister cited the Bhiwandi franchise as a benchmark success. Before Torrent Power took over as distribution franchisee, the circle was burdened by rampant power theft, billing failures, and severe distribution leakage. The aggregate technical and commercial (AT&C) losses stood at as high as 41 per cent.
Under the franchise model, those losses have been brought down to approximately 10 per cent, while energy bill recovery has reached 98 per cent — a near-complete turnaround in collection efficiency. Shaikh himself acknowledged that the Bhiwandi franchise model between 2006 and 2026 has emerged as a role model, placing Bhiwandi at the top compared to Mahavitaran's broader loss profile.
Government's Position on Franchises vs Privatisation
Fadnavis drew a clear distinction between the franchise model and outright privatisation. He said public-private collaborations under franchising agreements are deployed exclusively in high-loss regions to ensure round-the-clock power supply for residents and industrial units, while shielding the state exchequer from sustained financial losses. Mahavitaran's foundational ownership, he stressed, remains with the state.
Shaikh's Demands and the Government's Response
Member Rais Shaikh urged the Chief Minister to consider extending special incentives to Bhiwandi in recognition of its operational achievements, but Fadnavis indicated this would not be feasible given existing regulatory protocols. Shaikh also pitched for a prepaid electricity system modelled on mobile services — where the consumer number stays static and consumers can purchase prepaid units from any service provider. He additionally demanded a waiver of interest charged to consumers, particularly for dues predating the franchise model's implementation. The Chief Minister did not commit to either demand.
What This Means for Maharashtra's Power Sector
The clarification comes amid broader scrutiny of state electricity utilities across India, where distribution losses remain a persistent drag on finances. Maharashtra's use of the franchise route — rather than full privatisation — reflects a middle path that several states have debated but few have sustained at scale. The Bhiwandi data, if independently verified, would represent one of the more credible turnaround cases in Indian power distribution. How far the model can be replicated in other high-loss circles across Maharashtra remains the central question going forward.