Sharad Kapoor Accused of Molestation: Complainant Urges Case Transfer to Crime Branch
Synopsis
In a significant legal move, the complainant in the molestation case against actor Sharad Kapoor seeks a transfer of her case to the Crime Branch, raising serious concerns regarding police handling and the accused's ongoing freedom.
Key Takeaways
Complainant seeks transfer of the case to the Crime Branch.
Allegations include molestation by actor Sharad Kapoor.
Concerns raised about police inaction and handling of evidence.
Advocate criticizes selective arrests in similar cases.
The case continues to attract significant media attention.
Mumbai, Feb 24 (NationPress) A woman alleging molestation by actor Sharad Kapoor has approached the Bombay High Court to request the transfer of her case to the Crime Branch. Additionally, she has called for the suspension of the police officer involved in the investigation.
The 32-year-old complainant asserts that Kapoor summoned her to his residence under the guise of discussing a project, where he subsequently molested her.
Ali Kaashif Khan, the advocate representing the complainant, informed IANS, “The woman has initiated a petition against the police complaint authority, along with senior police inspector Karkay and the investigation officer. Notices have been issued, evidence has been recorded, and cross-examinations have occurred, yet the case remains closed. Notably, despite Sharad Kapoor presenting WhatsApp screenshots, the Khar police have not taken action against him. In a similar case, another accused was arrested within 24 hours under the same section 79.”
Khan further criticized the selective enforcement of the law, stating, “The law should not be applied at an officer's discretion. They need to provide justification. Moreover, the chargesheet incorrectly claims that the accused was arrested and presented in court.”
He emphasized, “This statement in the chargesheet is a significant falsehood. We also raised concerns about the issuance of a summons notice to the accused after his purported arrest, under section 35, which was previously 41A. The accused has not provided his statement as required. The police have displayed unwarranted authority, breaching existing Supreme Court laws. The FIR was lodged by the woman in 2024, and over a year has passed without the accused being apprehended. The police have also invoked section 67A of the Information Technology Act, which carries a penalty of five years.”
Point of View
It's crucial to present an unbiased account of this serious matter. The complainant's request for a transfer to the Crime Branch highlights potential issues within the current investigation. This case raises significant questions about the enforcement of the law and the treatment of allegations in the entertainment industry.
NationPress
8 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the allegations against Sharad Kapoor?
Sharad Kapoor is accused of molestation by a 32-year-old woman who claims he called her to his home under false pretenses.
What action has the complainant taken?
The complainant has filed a petition in the Bombay High Court seeking to transfer the case to the Crime Branch and has requested the suspension of the involved police officer.
Why is the complainant seeking a transfer to the Crime Branch?
The complainant believes that the current investigation has been mishandled and seeks a more competent authority to handle the case.
What has the advocate claimed regarding police actions?
The advocate alleged that the police have been selective in their arrests and have not justified their inaction against Kapoor despite evidence.
When was the FIR filed?
The FIR was filed by the complainant in 2024.
