Tips Music rejects Puja Entertainment's IP claims as malicious, misconceived
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Tips Music Limited on Thursday, 14 May issued a sharp rebuttal to what it called “malicious and misconceived” claims by filmmaker Vashu Bhagnani's production banner Puja Entertainment (India) Ltd. (PEIL), escalating an ongoing legal dispute over music and intellectual property rights.
The Legal Dispute
Puja Entertainment had approached the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Katihar, Bihar, alleging that its films, songs, and other copyrighted content were reportedly being used and commercially exploited without proper authorisation by Tips. The Bihar court reportedly granted an interim protection order and directed all involved parties to maintain status quo pending further proceedings.
What Tips Music Said
Responding via its official Instagram account, Tips Music Limited stated: “Tips clarifies that it is the lawful owner of the music rights in question, supported by valid and binding agreements between the parties.”
The label further asserted that it “has openly and legitimately exploited these rights for nearly three decades in full compliance with applicable laws.” On the allegations themselves, Tips did not mince words: “The claims made by PEIL are strongly disputed and appear to be malicious, misconceived, and intended to tarnish the reputation and goodwill of Tips.”
The statement concluded that Tips “remains fully confident in defending its rights before the appropriate courts and shall take all necessary legal steps to protect its interest and ownership of rights.” Notably, Tips added that it was still awaiting formal copies of the court order at the time of issuing the statement.
Background on Both Parties
Puja Entertainment was established by Vashu Bhagnani in 1986 and has bankrolled several commercially successful Bollywood titles, including Coolie No. 1 (1995), Hero No. 1 (1997), and Biwi No. 1 (1999). Tips Music, on the other hand, was founded in 1975 by brothers Kumar S. Taurani and Ramesh S. Taurani, making it one of India's older independent music labels with a catalogue spanning decades.
Why This Case Matters
The dispute highlights a broader tension in India's entertainment industry over legacy music rights — agreements struck in an era before digital streaming that are now being contested as catalogue valuations soar. This is not the first time a production house and a music label have clashed over the scope of rights transferred under older contracts. With streaming royalties increasingly lucrative, such disputes are likely to multiply. The choice of a Bihar civil court — rather than a commercial court in Mumbai — as the forum for the suit is also notable and may itself become a point of contention in proceedings ahead.
What Happens Next
Tips Music has indicated it will pursue all legal remedies available to it. The matter is currently before the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Katihar, Bihar, with the status quo order in place. Both parties are expected to file formal responses once official copies of the court order are served.