Pakistan: 100+ activists urge govt to allow bail for jailed rights lawyers

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Pakistan: 100+ activists urge govt to allow bail for jailed rights lawyers

Synopsis

Over 100 civil society groups, lawyers, and academics are urging Pakistan's government not to block bail for two human rights lawyers jailed 109 days ago for social media posts. The case — a combined 17-year sentence under PECA — has drawn global condemnation and is now before Pakistan's Supreme Court, making it a defining test of the country's commitment to free expression.

Key Takeaways

More than 100 civil society organisations have urged Pakistan's federal government not to oppose bail for lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha .
The two have been in detention for 109 days following conviction under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over social media posts.
A sessions court in Islamabad sentenced them to a combined 17 years in prison and fined each 36 million Pakistani rupees in January 2025 .
The Islamabad High Court has not yet scheduled a hearing for their bail and sentence suspension applications.
A Supreme Court hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, 13 May 2025 , and the outcome is seen as a key test of judicial independence on free speech.

More than 100 civil society organisations, lawyers, journalists, academics, and human rights defenders have called on Pakistan's federal government to refrain from opposing the bail of human rights lawyers Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha, ahead of a scheduled hearing in the country's Supreme Court on Tuesday, 13 May 2025. The signatories described the continued detention of the couple as "unjustified" and a direct threat to freedom of expression and digital rights in Pakistan.

The Joint Statement

In a collective appeal, the signatories stated that 109 days have elapsed since the arrest and conviction of the two lawyers in a case linked to online expression under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA). They noted that the Islamabad High Court has failed to schedule a hearing for the appellants' applications for suspension of sentence and bail, resulting in what they called "prolonged deprivation of liberty contrary to constitutional guarantees of due process and fair trial."

"This case raises critical concerns regarding freedom of expression, the misuse of PECA against lawful speech, and the protection of fundamental rights in Pakistan. The continued detention of the appellants pending adjudication of their appeals has had a chilling effect on democratic discourse and digital rights, undermining the right to freedom of speech in Pakistan," the statement read.

What the Signatories Are Demanding

The coalition specifically urged the federal government, represented by the office of the Attorney General of Pakistan, not to oppose the appellants' request for bail and suspension of sentence before the Supreme Court. "In a case concerning non-violent, lawful online speech, continued incarceration serves neither justice nor the public interest," they noted. The signatories pledged to continue monitoring the scheduled proceedings and reaffirmed their commitment to constitutional freedoms and digital rights across Pakistan.

Background: The Conviction and Sentence

In January 2025, a sessions court in Islamabad reportedly sentenced Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and her husband Hadi Ali Chattha to a combined 17 years in prison, with each fined 36 million Pakistani rupees on multiple charges linked to social media posts. The case was filed under PECA, a law that critics argue has increasingly been deployed against lawful online speech and dissent in Pakistan.

International Criticism and Broader Implications

The arrest and conviction of the two human rights lawyers have drawn widespread condemnation internationally, with rights groups and legal bodies flagging the case as emblematic of a broader crackdown on digital expression in Pakistan. This comes amid growing concern over the use of PECA to silence journalists, activists, and legal professionals who speak out on sensitive political matters. Notably, this is not the first time Pakistani authorities have faced accusations of weaponising cybercrime legislation against critics — a pattern that watchdog organisations say has intensified in recent years.

With the Supreme Court hearing now approaching, the outcome of the bail application is expected to serve as a significant indicator of the judiciary's willingness to push back against executive overreach in free speech cases.

Point of View

And the Mazari-Hazir–Chattha case crystallises that concern: a combined 17-year sentence for social media posts, with the High Court failing to even schedule a bail hearing for 109 days. The coalition appeal is significant not because it will necessarily sway the government, but because it signals that civil society — lawyers, journalists, academics — is publicly on record. The Supreme Court now carries the weight of a credibility test. If the government actively opposes bail in a non-violent speech case, and the court allows continued detention, the international narrative around Pakistan's democratic backsliding will be very difficult to counter.
NationPress
8 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who are Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha?
Imaan Zainab Mazari-Hazir and Hadi Ali Chattha are human rights lawyers and a married couple who were convicted in January 2025 by a sessions court in Islamabad on charges linked to social media posts under PECA. They were sentenced to a combined 17 years in prison and fined 36 million Pakistani rupees each.
Why are over 100 organisations calling on the Pakistan government?
The coalition is urging the federal government not to oppose the lawyers' bail application before the Supreme Court, arguing that 109 days of detention for non-violent online speech violates constitutional guarantees of due process and fair trial. They describe the continued incarceration as serving neither justice nor the public interest.
What is PECA and why is it controversial?
The Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) is Pakistan's cybercrime law, which critics argue has increasingly been misused to prosecute journalists, activists, and lawyers for lawful online expression. Rights groups say its broad provisions allow authorities to criminalise dissent under the guise of cybercrime enforcement.
What has the Islamabad High Court done in this case?
According to the joint statement, the Islamabad High Court has failed to schedule a hearing for the lawyers' applications for suspension of sentence and bail, despite the urgency of the matter, resulting in prolonged detention.
What happens next in this case?
The bail application is scheduled to be heard by Pakistan's Supreme Court on Tuesday, 13 May 2025. The outcome is widely seen as a significant test of the judiciary's independence and Pakistan's commitment to freedom of expression and digital rights.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 5 months ago
  5. 5 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 7 months ago
  8. 8 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google