HinduPACT accuses USCIRF of 'smear campaign' against RSS chief Bhagwat

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
HinduPACT accuses USCIRF of 'smear campaign' against RSS chief Bhagwat

Synopsis

A US-based Hindu advocacy group has gone on the offensive against a federal religious freedom commission, accusing it of running a coordinated smear campaign against RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat ahead of his proposed American visit. The dispute lays bare a deepening fault line between Hindu diaspora organisations and civil society groups over how India's Hindu institutions are framed in US policy circles.

Key Takeaways

HinduPACT accused USCIRF of running a 'smear campaign' against RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat ahead of his proposed US visit .
USCIRF Chair Asif Mahmood and Commissioner Gene Mills had opposed Bhagwat's visit; Mills reportedly called for sanctions against RSS members.
HinduPACT founder Ajay Shah said the commission had 'disgraced its mandate' by adopting an 'anti-Hindu narrative.' CAIR , IAMC , and Hindus for Human Rights were named by HinduPACT as supporting the campaign — none responded in the statement.
USCIRF is an independent US federal body whose recommendations are advisory and non-binding on the US government.

HinduPACT, a Hindu advocacy organisation based in the United States, has formally accused the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) of orchestrating a 'smear campaign' against Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat ahead of his proposed visit to the United States. The organisation issued its statement from San Ramon, California, on 22 August, charging that the commission had weaponised its religious freedom mandate to target Hindu institutions and India.

What HinduPACT Alleged

HinduPACT alleged that statements by USCIRF Chair Asif Mahmood and Commissioner Gene Mills opposing Bhagwat's visit were unbalanced and unfairly cast Hindu organisations as dangerous. The group said Mills' call for sanctions against RSS members allegedly responsible for violations of freedom of religion or belief lacked, in its words, 'rigor, due process, or evidentiary discipline.'

The organisation further alleged that USCIRF had shown little interest in anti-Hindu hatred, temple vandalism, or the civic exclusion faced by Hindus within the United States — a charge the commission has not publicly addressed.

Key Accusations Against Civil Society Groups

HinduPACT also named three civil society organisations — the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), and Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR) — accusing them of supporting the campaign against Bhagwat's visit. The statement did not include responses from any of the three groups, nor from USCIRF itself.

What HinduPACT's Founder Said

Ajay Shah, founder and chair of HinduPACT, accused the federal commission of abandoning its mandate. 'USCIRF has disgraced its mandate. When its chair speaks about India and the RSS, he sounds less like the head of a pluralistic American commission and more like an advocate for a hardened anti-Hindu narrative,' Shah said.

Shah added: 'Mohan Bhagwat leads one of the world's most consequential Hindu organizations. He should not be met with slander scripted by CAIR, IAMC, and HfHR, groups that have made a habit of treating Hindu self-assertion as extremism.' He also cited the RSS's decades of work in relief operations, education, village uplift, and social organisation as evidence of its community standing.

'American Hindus see the pattern clearly. We will not accept a taxpayer-funded body being used to malign our faith, our institutions, and India's democratic voice,' Shah said.

HinduPACT's Defence of the RSS

HinduPACT described the RSS as 'a central organising force in modern Hindu society,' arguing that the organisation had built its legitimacy through grassroots presence in neighbourhoods and villages rather than through think tanks or policy seminars. The group characterised criticism of Hindu organisations as a recurring pattern of 'selective outrage, guilt by association, and a studied refusal to acknowledge anti-Hindu bias by name.'

It called on elected officials, community leaders, and Americans broadly to reject what it described as 'sectarian lobbying presented as human rights advocacy.'

About USCIRF

The US Commission on International Religious Freedom is an independent, bipartisan federal body established under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998. It monitors religious freedom conditions abroad and makes policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State, and Congress. Crucially, its recommendations are advisory and carry no binding legal force on the US government.

With Bhagwat's visit still proposed and no official US government response on record, the dispute is likely to intensify scrutiny on how American institutions engage with India's largest Hindu organisation.

Point of View

Yet the political optics of a US federal body opposing an RSS chief's visit carry significant symbolic weight — and HinduPACT is clearly aware of that. What the statement does not address is the substantive basis of USCIRF's concerns, choosing instead to contest the commission's legitimacy and impute motive. That approach may energise the Hindu diaspora base but is unlikely to shift the policy conversation, which will continue in Washington largely on its own terms.
NationPress
22 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is HinduPACT's accusation against USCIRF?
HinduPACT has accused USCIRF of running a 'smear campaign' against RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat ahead of his proposed visit to the United States, alleging that statements by USCIRF Chair Asif Mahmood and Commissioner Gene Mills were unbalanced and unfairly portrayed Hindu organisations as dangerous.
Why is USCIRF opposing Mohan Bhagwat's US visit?
USCIRF Chair Asif Mahmood and Commissioner Gene Mills have publicly opposed Bhagwat's proposed visit, with Mills reportedly calling for sanctions against RSS members allegedly responsible for violations of freedom of religion or belief. USCIRF has not publicly detailed its full evidentiary basis in this statement.
What is USCIRF and how much power does it have?
USCIRF is an independent, bipartisan US federal commission established under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998. It monitors religious freedom conditions abroad and makes policy recommendations to the President, the Secretary of State, and Congress, but its recommendations are advisory and not legally binding on the US government.
Which groups did HinduPACT accuse of supporting the campaign against Bhagwat?
HinduPACT named the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), and Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR) as supporting the campaign against Bhagwat's visit. None of the three groups provided a response in HinduPACT's statement.
Who is Ajay Shah and what did he say?
Ajay Shah is the founder and chair of HinduPACT. He accused USCIRF of abandoning its pluralistic mandate, saying the commission's chair sounded 'more like an advocate for a hardened anti-Hindu narrative' than the head of a federal body, and called on Americans to reject what he described as 'sectarian lobbying presented as human rights advocacy.'
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 16 hours ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 6 months ago
  4. 6 months ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google