Why Are M23 Rebels Withdrawing from Uvira in DR Congo?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The recent withdrawal of M23 rebel fighters from Uvira marks a significant development in the ongoing conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Their departure, initiated at the behest of US mediators, is framed as a confidence-building measure amidst ongoing peace negotiations but is met with skepticism by government officials.
Key Takeaways
- M23 rebels have begun withdrawing from Uvira.
- The withdrawal is seen as a confidence-building measure amid peace talks.
- DRC government describes the move as a diversion.
- Conditions for withdrawal include security guarantees.
- Ongoing negotiations are part of the Doha peace process.
Uvira (Congo), Dec 18 (NationPress) Members of the March 23 Movement (M23) rebel faction have commenced their withdrawal from Uvira, a key city situated in the eastern region of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), as observed by a Xinhua journalist on-site.
The M23 had asserted control over Uvira last week, which previously acted as the temporary administrative hub for the South Kivu province. On Monday, the group revealed its intention to "unilaterally withdraw its forces" from Uvira, responding to a request from US mediators and labeling it a confidence-building measure aimed at enhancing the ongoing peace efforts.
Nonetheless, Patrick Muyaya, the government spokesperson for the DRC, regarded the announcement as a mere "diversion."
In a statement released on Monday evening, Corneille Nangaa, head of the Congo River Alliance (AFC)—a politico-military coalition allied with the M23—characterized the withdrawal as "conditional," stipulating the need for security assurances. These assurances involve the deployment of a neutral force to safeguard civilians against potential retaliation following their exit.
This decision was made subsequent to recent advancements in the Doha peace talks, including the signing of the Doha Framework Agreement in November. The M23 expressed its desire to undertake a "unilateral trust-building measure" to maximize the potential success of the Doha peace process, paving the way for a sustainable resolution to the conflict.
Since March of this year, multiple negotiation rounds between the M23 and the Congolese government have been conducted under Qatari mediation, collectively known as the Doha peace process. This culminated in the signing of a Declaration of Principles in July, which established a target date of August 18 for finalizing a peace agreement, a deadline that has now lapsed.
According to the announcement, the withdrawal from Uvira was executed at the request of United States mediation. The movement indicated that it took this step "despite ongoing provocations and abuses" from the Armed Forces of the DRC (FARDC) and their allies.
Point of View
It is crucial to underscore that the nation stands firm on peace negotiations. The M23's withdrawal from Uvira adds complexity to the ongoing dialogue, raising questions about genuine commitment to peace and the safety of civilians during this transition.
NationPress
19/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the M23 to withdraw from Uvira?
The M23 rebel group withdrew from Uvira at the request of US mediators as a confidence-building measure to support ongoing peace negotiations.
What was the DRC government's reaction to the withdrawal?
DRC government spokesperson Patrick Muyaya dismissed the M23's announcement as a diversion.
What are the conditions associated with the M23's withdrawal?
The withdrawal is considered conditional, with demands for security guarantees, including the deployment of a neutral force to protect civilians.
What recent developments have occurred in the Doha peace talks?
Recent progress includes the signing of the Doha Framework Agreement, aimed at facilitating a sustainable resolution to the conflict.
How has the international community responded to the situation?
International mediation, particularly from the US and Qatari officials, has played a crucial role in trying to resolve the ongoing conflict.
