Is Trump Really Removing the US from 31 UN-Linked Organizations?

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Is Trump Really Removing the US from 31 UN-Linked Organizations?

Synopsis

In a bold move, President Trump announces the US exit from 31 UN-linked organizations, arguing they contradict American priorities. This decision amplifies his ongoing America First policy, impacting crucial sectors like trade and climate change. Will this reshape the US's role in global governance?

Key Takeaways

Trump's withdrawal from 31 UN-linked organizations marks a significant ideological shift.
The move is part of the America First policy aimed at prioritizing US interests.
Key organizations affected include UNCTAD, the Population Fund, and various trade and climate-related entities.
The decision may lead to substantial funding cuts and a potential isolation of the US on global issues.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasizes a focus on cooperation that benefits the American people.

United Nations, Jan 8 (NationPress) In a significant, ideology-driven action against the UN, President Donald Trump is withdrawing the US from 31 organizations associated with the UN, claiming they “no longer align with American interests.”

On Wednesday, Trump instructed US departments and agencies to cease participation in or funding for these entities along with 35 other non-UN organizations.

According to the White House, these organizations “operate against US national interests, security, economic prosperity, or sovereignty” and prioritize “globalist agendas over US priorities.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio remarked that these organizations “actively aim to limit US sovereignty and are supported by the same elite networks,” which he derisively termed the ‘multilateral NGO-plex’.

Reinforcing the America First approach that Trump campaigned on, Rubio stated, “We seek cooperation where it benefits our citizens and will remain resolute when it does not.”

Many of the organizations included focus on areas such as climate change, gender issues, and population control, which contradict the president’s ideology, along with those in trade and economic sectors.

Key organizations targeted include the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), International Trade Centre, UN Framework Conference on Climate Change, UN Population Fund, and the UN’s Department of Economic and Social Affairs, as well as economic and social commissions for Asia and other regions, and the Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.

While some, like UNCTAD and the Population Fund, receive direct funding, many on the list are supported by the UN's regular budget, to which Washington contributes 22 percent.

Trump has not disclosed the US contribution of $820 million for 2025, which was approved by Congress, and his administration has suggested reducing the US contribution this year by $610 million.

In one of his initial actions following his re-election, Trump, who has labeled climate change a “hoax” and promoted fossil fuel energy sources, withdrew the US from the Paris Climate Agreement aimed at mitigating global warming, which was established through UNFCC negotiations.

Rubio elaborated on the ideological justification, stating, “What began as a pragmatic framework for international organizations aimed at peace and cooperation has evolved into a vast structure of global governance, frequently dominated by progressive ideology and detached from national interests.”

Secretary-General Antonio Guterres did not provide an immediate response to the Trump administration's decision to withdraw from these organizations and entities.

Wednesday’s actions are part of Trump’s ongoing campaign against UN-related organizations.

Previously, he mandated the US exit from the cultural, educational, and scientific organization UNESCO, the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA, and the UN Human Rights Council.

Other UN organizations targeted include the offices of the Secretary-General's special representatives addressing children in armed conflict, violence against children, and sexual violence in armed conflict.

Non-UN organizations on the chopping block include the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, the Global Counterterrorism Forum, the Global Forum on Cyber Expertise, the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, and the International Solar Alliance.

Point of View

It's essential to recognize the impact of such drastic measures on both domestic and international fronts. While President Trump's actions reflect a specific ideology, they also risk isolating the US from crucial global discussions and collaborations. Balancing national interests with global responsibilities is key to a sustainable future.
NationPress
12 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the implications of the US leaving UN-linked organizations?
The withdrawal may hinder US influence on global issues like climate change and trade, potentially isolating the nation from essential discussions.
Why is Trump targeting these particular organizations?
Trump claims these organizations advance globalist agendas that conflict with American interests and sovereignty.
What is the America First policy?
The America First policy prioritizes US interests in foreign relations, often at the expense of international cooperation.
How will this affect funding for international programs?
The US's withdrawal may result in funding cuts for programs related to climate change, gender equality, and global health.
Is this move supported by all political factions?
The decision has sparked debate, with supporters praising the focus on national interests, while critics warn of the risks of isolationism.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 7 months ago
  7. 7 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google