Did Abhishek Banerjee Accuse ECI of 'Selective Leaks' and Demand Transparency Over Bengal SIR?

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Did Abhishek Banerjee Accuse ECI of 'Selective Leaks' and Demand Transparency Over Bengal SIR?

Synopsis

In a recent clash of words, Abhishek Banerjee of the Trinamool Congress accused the ECI of misleading the public through selective leaks regarding the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. He demands full transparency, including CCTV footage, and insists on answers to five critical questions raised by his party.

Key Takeaways

Accusations of misinformation: Abhishek Banerjee claims the ECI misled the public through selective leaks.
Demand for transparency: Banerjee is calling for the release of CCTV footage related to the electoral roll revision.
Concerns over electoral integrity: The Trinamool Congress delegation raised questions about the SIR's real intentions.
Response from ECI: The ECI maintains they provided adequate rebuttals to TMC's concerns.
Electoral process significance: The SIR process is crucial for maintaining an accurate voters' list.

Kolkata, Nov 28 (NationPress) Trinamool Congress general secretary and Lok Sabha MP Abhishek Banerjee has publicly charged the Election Commission of India (ECI) with misleading the populace via selective leaks. He claims that the commission has provided a "point-wise rebuttal" to the concerns raised by a 10-member Trinamool Congress parliamentary delegation regarding the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in West Bengal.

Banerjee has demanded that the ECI present full evidence, including CCTV footage, and respond to five specific queries posed by the party.

In a social media statement, Banerjee remarked: "The Election Commission is intentionally disseminating selective leaks to falsely assert that they have addressed the issues raised by the AITC delegation today. These claims are not merely misleading; they are BLATANT LIES. If the EC genuinely has nothing to conceal and values transparency, it must promptly release the complete CCTV footage and all evidence it claims to possess. Anything short of this only reveals their ill intentions and creates serious doubts about their motives."

He insisted that the commission should take the necessary time to adequately respond to the five questions raised by the Trinamool delegation, stating that a few hours would be insufficient.

"Let me be clear: A few hours will never be enough; take as long as you need to answer the five fundamental questions we posed," he noted.

He further indicated that the party possesses "sufficient digital evidence" to demonstrate how the ECI’s narrative is being misrepresented through orchestrated and fabricated leaks, cautioning the commission to reconsider before "engaging in conflict" with West Bengal and the Trinamool Congress.

Earlier that day, the 10-member Trinamool Congress delegation, headed by Derek O'Brien, met with senior ECI officials at Nirvachan Sadan in Delhi to address concerns related to the SIR.

Post-meeting, delegation members accused Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar of failing to satisfactorily answer five pivotal questions, including whether the true aim of the SIR was to identify "fake voters" or alleged "infiltrators", and why West Bengal was being singled out while other border states were not affected.

Derek O'Brien accused the commission of disregarding repeated alerts from West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and the party’s leadership regarding the impossibility of completing the SIR process, alleging that it was being pursued despite the risks posed to field officers and citizens.

"Yet the ECI ignored repeated warnings on this issue, and the human toll persisted while adhering to the commission’s directives that prioritize partisan advantage over life and fairness. These distressing occurrences reveal a grim reality: the BJP, supported by a compliant Election Commission, is prepared to endanger lives for power," O’Brien asserted.

However, the ECI has robustly dismissed the delegation’s public assertions. In its rebuttal, senior commission officials stated that the ECI had indeed provided a "point-wise rebuttal" to every concern raised by the TMC MPs. Commission insiders clarified that the revision process is being executed strictly in accordance with constitutional mandates and electoral laws, emphasizing that political entities should engage cooperatively in the process rather than undermine it.

The ECI informed the delegation that all objections, complaints, and documentary submissions related to the revision process must be filed only after the draft electoral rolls are published on December 9, after which claims and objections can be formally assessed. The commission also reminded the Trinamool Congress delegation that the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections are constitutional responsibilities of the ECI, and stakeholders must act within the legal framework.

Regarding allegations that booth-level officers (BLOs), electoral registration officers, assistant electoral registration officers, and data-entry operators were operating under extreme stress or facing intimidation, commission sources assured the delegation that such complaints would be taken seriously. The ECI has instructed the top police administration in West Bengal to ensure that these officials -- state employees currently assigned to assist the ECI -- are not threatened, coerced, or subjected to partisan pressure.

Commission insiders reiterated that the SIR’s stated goal is to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the voters’ list, including the elimination of ineligible entries, and that all legally mandated measures to remove fake voters or non-citizens from the rolls would be enforced as part of the revision initiative.

After departing from the ECI meeting, Trinamool Congress MPs reaffirmed their demand for clarity on the five questions and accused the commission of failing to address their concerns adequately, despite the ECI's claim of providing point-by-point replies. This standoff leaves the matter unresolved until the draft rolls are published and any formal objections are filed and adjudicated.

Point of View

It is imperative to note that allegations against the Election Commission of India, especially regarding transparency and credibility, should be scrutinized thoroughly. While Banerjee's concerns raise significant questions about electoral integrity, it is equally important for the ECI to maintain its authority and uphold democratic processes. The resolution of these disputes is crucial for public trust in the electoral system.
NationPress
9 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Abhishek Banerjee accuse the ECI of?
He accused the Election Commission of India of misleading the public through selective leaks regarding the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
What does Banerjee demand from the ECI?
He demands full transparency, including the release of CCTV footage and answers to five specific questions posed by his party.
What are the main concerns raised by the Trinamool Congress delegation?
Their concerns include the real intention behind the SIR and the targeting of West Bengal compared to other states.
How did the ECI respond to the allegations?
The ECI rejected the allegations, asserting that they provided a point-wise rebuttal to the concerns raised by the TMC MPs.
What is the significance of the SIR process?
The SIR process aims to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the voters' list, including the removal of ineligible entries.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 months ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 5 months ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 5 months ago
  8. 6 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google