Anbil Mahesh bail rejected by Chennai court in school approval scam
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A special court in Chennai on Tuesday, 10 November 2026, dismissed the bail petition of former Tamil Nadu School Education Minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi in an alleged corruption case involving the collection of money from private schools in exchange for approvals and regulatory permits. The case centres on irregularities allegedly carried out during the previous Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government.
Special Judge L.S. Sathyamoorthy rejected the petition after accepting the prosecution's argument that the investigation remains at a preliminary stage and that further questioning of the accused is still required.
Background: Arrest and Remand
Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi has been lodged at Puzhal Central Prison for the past 16 days following his arrest by the Chennai Central Crime Branch. The allegations against him involve large-scale irregularities in granting recognition and regulatory permissions to private educational institutions.
The investigation initially targeted private schools association administrator P.D. Arakumar and others, before the former minister was subsequently named as an accused. Anticipating arrest, Mahesh had moved the Madras High Court for anticipatory bail, but Justice V. Lakshminarayanan declined to grant relief on 26 October, following which police arrested him and secured his judicial remand. Investigators then obtained three days of police custody to question him regarding the alleged financial transactions.
What the Defence Argued
Senior advocate Abudu Kumar Rajarathnam, representing Mahesh, argued that investigators had failed to produce direct evidence linking his client to the alleged corruption. He questioned the shifting estimates of total illicit collections, noting that the amount cited had escalated from ₹100 crore to ₹400 crore, then ₹600 crore, and finally ₹800 crore over the course of the investigation.
The defence further submitted that Mahesh's mobile phone and electronic devices had already been seized, ruling out any possibility of evidence tampering, and assured the court that he would cooperate fully with investigators.
What the Prosecution Claimed
Government counsel R. John Sathyan alleged that Mahesh maintained close connections with co-accused Muthukumar and Arakumar. The prosecution claimed that money collected by Muthukumar was transported to Mahesh's residence by an individual identified as Saravanan, and that investigators possess video evidence supporting this allegation.
Crucially, the prosecution noted that Saravanan remains absconding, making additional interrogation necessary — a key reason the court accepted the argument against granting bail at this stage.
What Happens Next
The court reserved its order on 5 November before pronouncing the decision on Tuesday. With bail dismissed, Mahesh will remain in judicial custody while investigators continue examining the alleged corruption network. This is a significant development in what has become one of the more high-profile state-level corruption cases in Tamil Nadu in recent years, with the alleged collections figure — now reportedly as high as ₹800 crore — drawing considerable public attention.