Swami Avimukteshwaranand Ready to Comply with POCSO Investigation Amid Criticism of Uttar Pradesh Government
Synopsis
On February 23, Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati expressed his willingness to face arrest and fully cooperate with the ongoing POCSO investigation while criticizing the Uttar Pradesh government. His statements highlight his commitment to a swift resolution of the case.
Key Takeaways
Willingness to cooperate: Swami Avimukteshwaranand is prepared to face arrest.
Criticism of government: He has voiced concerns regarding the Uttar Pradesh government's handling of the situation.
Investigation interest: He claims a strong personal interest in resolving the allegations quickly.
Surveillance awareness: Extensive CCTV measures were noted during his previous stay in Prayagraj.
Ongoing investigation: The case remains under investigation with no official updates yet.
Varanasi, Feb 23 (NationPress) Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati stated on Monday that he is prepared to confront arrest and is committed to cooperating entirely with any investigation linked to the POCSO case. He also expressed his discontent with the Uttar Pradesh government.
During a press conference, the seer emphasized that if an inquiry is ongoing, he is more invested than the authorities in achieving a swift resolution to the allegations of misconduct.
"Should an investigation be ongoing, we will provide our cooperation. While the police and state have a vested interest in resolving the case, our commitment to ensuring this issue is addressed promptly exceeds theirs," he remarked.
Regarding the potential for custodial arrest, he argued that such a measure would be unwarranted at this stage, as custodial arrests are generally intended to preserve evidence, perform medical assessments, or prevent the accused from fleeing.
"With so much time having passed, all three justifications have become irrelevant, making an arrest now pointless. Nevertheless, if such a situation arises, we will offer our full cooperation," he noted.
The Shankaracharya mentioned that he possesses limited details about the case, suggesting that journalists seemed to have more insight than he did. He clarified that no specialized legal team had been called urgently, although some attorneys had voluntarily come to provide assistance.
Quoting from the Ramcharitmanas, he indicated that deceit and hypocrisy ultimately meet their end, referencing an episode involving Ravana as a moral lesson.
He also highlighted the comprehensive surveillance measures during his previous visit to Prayagraj, noting the extensive installation of CCTV cameras monitored from a centralized control room.
"You may inquire with the officials regarding the expenditure on the CCTVs and the storage of the footage," he suggested, implying that visual evidence could clarify circumstances if necessary.
The investigation into the case continues, with state authorities yet to issue an official statement regarding the seer's situation.
Point of View
Swami Avimukteshwaranand's commitment to cooperate with the POCSO investigation illustrates a proactive approach to legal challenges. His criticism of the Uttar Pradesh government adds a layer of complexity to the narrative, inviting public discourse about governance and accountability. The situation merits close attention as it unfolds.
NationPress
9 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Swami Avimukteshwaranand's stance on the POCSO case?
He expressed readiness to face arrest and complete cooperation with the investigation while criticizing the Uttar Pradesh government.
Why did he argue against custodial arrests?
He stated that the reasons for custodial arrests have become irrelevant after a significant amount of time has passed.
What does he believe about the ongoing investigation?
He believes he has a greater interest in resolving the case swiftly than the authorities.
What surveillance measures were mentioned?
He pointed out the extensive installation of CCTV cameras in Prayagraj during his previous visit.
Has there been an official statement from the state authorities?
As of now, there has been no official statement from the state authorities regarding the case.
