Bengaluru techie filmed while bathing; man arrested under voyeurism law

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Bengaluru techie filmed while bathing; man arrested under voyeurism law

Synopsis

A 23-year-old software engineer in Bengaluru was allegedly filmed through her bathroom window by a neighbour on 30 April. The arrest of the accused, Karthik, adds to a disturbing pattern of voyeurism cases in the city — including the Infosys campus incident and a hidden camera at a popular café — raising urgent questions about women's safety and digital privacy enforcement.

Key Takeaways

A 23-year-old software engineer was allegedly filmed while bathing at her residence in Ashraya Layout, Garudacharpalya, Bengaluru on 30 April .
The accused, Karthik , a Kerala-origin man living in an adjacent rented house, was arrested by Mahadevapura police after the victim lodged a complaint.
An FIR has been filed under BNS Section 77 (voyeurism) and Section 79 (insult to modesty/privacy intrusion).
The victim is reportedly in a state of shock; police are working to recover the mobile phone used in the alleged recording.
The case follows similar incidents in Bengaluru, including the Infosys campus voyeurism case and a hidden camera at Third Wave Coffee on BEL Road in 2025 .

A 23-year-old software engineer was allegedly filmed without her consent while bathing at her residence in Ashraya Layout, Garudacharpalya, Bengaluru, on 30 April. The Mahadevapura police have since arrested the accused, identified as Karthik, a Kerala-origin man who was reportedly staying in a rented house adjacent to the victim's residence.

How the Incident Unfolded

According to police, the victim had returned home from work and gone to bathe at approximately 9:30 pm. The accused allegedly positioned himself near the bathroom window and recorded her on his mobile phone. The woman reportedly noticed the recording in progress, screamed for help, and the accused fled the scene with the mobile phone. She subsequently lodged a formal complaint at the Mahadevapura police station, triggering an investigation that led to Karthik's arrest.

FIR and Charges Filed

Police have registered a First Information Report (FIR) against the accused under two sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Section 77 pertains to voyeurism — punishing anyone who watches or captures images of a woman engaged in a private act where she expects privacy, or disseminates such images without consent. Section 79 covers any word, gesture, act, or object used with the intention to insult the modesty of a woman or intrude upon her privacy, including stalking and inappropriate gestures. Investigators confirmed that the accused was employed at a private company in Bengaluru at the time of the incident.

Victim's Condition

Police stated that the victim, who works as a software engineer at a private firm, has been left in a state of shock and is deeply distressed following the incident. Further investigation is currently underway, including efforts to recover the mobile phone used in the alleged recording.

A Pattern of Voyeurism Cases in Bengaluru

This incident is not isolated. Bengaluru has seen a troubling series of voyeurism cases in recent months. In 2025, Swapnil Nagesh Mali (28), a techie employed at Infosys on the Electronic City campus, was arrested on 30 June 2025 after being caught recording a female colleague in a workplace washroom. An internal HR investigation reportedly uncovered videos of more than 30 women on his device. He was charged under Section 77 of the BNS and Section 66E (violation of privacy) of the IT Act.

Separately, a 23-year-old staff member at Third Wave Coffee on BEL Road was arrested after a hidden camera was discovered in the women's washroom on 25 April 2025, having reportedly recorded for approximately two hours. The recurring nature of such incidents has raised questions about enforcement, awareness of digital privacy laws, and the safety of women in both private and professional spaces in the city. With Karthik's arrest, authorities are expected to examine the full contents of the recovered device as investigations proceed.

Point of View

A popular café, and now a residential neighbourhood — point to a systemic failure rather than isolated incidents. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita's Section 77 is a stronger legal tool than its predecessor, but arrests alone will not deter repeat behaviour without faster trials and visible consequences. Bengaluru's image as a progressive tech hub sits uneasily alongside this pattern, and it demands a sharper institutional response from both employers and law enforcement — not just reactive FIRs.
NationPress
9 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What happened in the Bengaluru techie voyeurism case?
A 23-year-old software engineer was allegedly filmed without consent while bathing at her home in Ashraya Layout, Garudacharpalya, Bengaluru on 30 April. The accused, identified as Karthik, reportedly recorded her through the bathroom window from an adjacent rented house before fleeing the scene.
Who was arrested in the Bengaluru voyeurism case?
The arrested accused is identified as Karthik, originally from Kerala and employed at a private company in Bengaluru. He was reportedly residing in a rented house next to the victim's residence at the time of the incident.
What charges have been filed against the accused?
Police have filed an FIR under BNS Section 77 (voyeurism — capturing or disseminating images of a woman in a private act without consent) and Section 79 (acts intended to insult the modesty of a woman or intrude upon her privacy). Investigation is ongoing.
Is this an isolated incident or part of a wider pattern in Bengaluru?
It is part of a wider pattern. In 2025, Infosys techie Swapnil Nagesh Mali was arrested for recording over 30 female colleagues at the Electronic City campus, and a Third Wave Coffee staffer was arrested after a hidden camera was found in a women's washroom on BEL Road on 25 April 2025.
What is BNS Section 77 on voyeurism?
BNS Section 77 punishes anyone who watches or captures images of a woman engaged in a private act where she reasonably expects privacy, or who disseminates such images without her consent. It replaced the corresponding provision under the Indian Penal Code and carries criminal penalties.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 10 months ago
  4. 10 months ago
  5. 11 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google