BRS dares CM Revanth Reddy to accept judicial probe into both families' assets

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BRS dares CM Revanth Reddy to accept judicial probe into both families' assets

Synopsis

BRS Working President KT Rama Rao has flipped the script on CM Revanth Reddy's Assembly-announced land inquiry into KCR — demanding a sitting High Court or Supreme Court judge examine the assets of both political families from birth. With Reddy himself now conceding the disputed holding is 67 acres, not the '1,000 acres' he repeatedly cited, the BRS has drawn first blood in what is shaping up as a high-stakes political and legal confrontation in Telangana.

Key Takeaways

BRS Working President K.T.
Rama Rao on 17 September challenged CM Revanth Reddy to accept a judicial probe by a sitting High Court or Supreme Court judge into the assets of both families.
The challenge was a direct response to CM Reddy's Assembly announcement on Wednesday of an inquiry into KCR's landholdings.
Rama Rao said CM Reddy personally admitted in the Assembly that KCR's land stood at 67 acres — far below the '1,000-acre farmhouse' figure Reddy had repeatedly cited.
Rama Rao traced KCR's ancestral property to Konapur and Chintamadaka , saying the family held land since before the 1930s .
BRS alleged that 420 electoral guarantees by the Congress government remain unfulfilled after 1,000 days in office.
Rama Rao demanded the government extend the Monsoon Session by a month and revoke the suspension of the BRS legislature party .

BRS Working President K.T. Rama Rao on Thursday, 17 September declared that his party is fully prepared for a comprehensive inquiry by a sitting High Court or Supreme Court judge into the family assets of both BRS chief K. Chandrasekhar Rao and Telangana Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy, tracing their holdings back to their birth. Speaking to reporters after hoisting the National Flag at Telangana Bhavan on National Integration Day, Rama Rao threw the challenge directly at the Chief Minister to accept a court-supervised probe without delay.

What triggered the challenge

Rama Rao was responding to Chief Minister Revanth Reddy's announcement in the Telangana Assembly on Wednesday that an inquiry would be conducted into the landholdings of K. Chandrasekhar Rao (KCR) and his family. Rama Rao countered by insisting that any such investigation must be conducted by a sitting judge — not by Special Investigation Teams (SITs) or special squads that the state government might constitute — and must cover the financial histories of both families equally.

'We have full faith in the judiciary,' Rama Rao said, adding that the BRS was 'fully prepared to face any legal consequence if even an iota of wrongdoing' was established against them.

The KCR land dispute: what BRS says

Rama Rao offered a detailed account of KCR's ancestral property, describing his life history as 'an open book.' He said KCR was born in 1954 into a landlord family in Chintamadaka, whose forefathers had owned hundreds of acres. According to Rama Rao, part of the family's original property in Konapur was acquired by the government for an irrigation project in the 1930s, and KCR's father used the compensation money to acquire land in Chintamadaka.

Rama Rao noted that Revanth Reddy himself had admitted in the Assembly that the disputed holding stood at 67 acres — far below the '1,000-acre farmhouse' figure the Chief Minister had previously cited repeatedly. 'Now, after 72 years, he has only 67 acres. Is that a reduction of wealth or an increase of wealth?' Rama Rao asked. He quipped that if the remaining 933 acres could be located, the family would willingly surrender them to the government.

BRS broadens attack on governance record

Rama Rao went beyond the asset dispute to mount a broader critique of the Congress-led state government, alleging that 420 electoral guarantees had proven 'entirely bogus' after what he called 1,000 days of 'administrative paralysis.' He accused the Chief Minister of orchestrating legislative proceedings without the principal opposition by engineering what he described as the undemocratic suspension of the BRS legislature party from the House.

He further alleged that CM Reddy was colluding with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to run Assembly sessions in the opposition's absence, and dared the government to extend the ongoing Monsoon Session by a month and revoke the suspensions. 'Instead of grandstanding that the opposition lacks the courage to look him in the eye, let him extend the session; we will not merely look you in the eye, we will grab you by the collar on behalf of the people of Telangana,' Rama Rao declared, citing unfulfilled promises including the ₹2,500 Mahalakshmi scheme, ₹4,000 pensions, Rythu Bandhu, and the cancellation of Rythu Bima.

Apology demand and what comes next

Rama Rao demanded a public apology from Chief Minister Revanth Reddy for what he called 'false propaganda and mudslinging' against KCR. He dismissed the CM's two-and-a-half-hour Assembly address as 'a monumental display of ignorance,' and cited past allegations — including claims of 150 bedrooms and golden bathrooms at Pragathi Bhavan, and secret tunnels beneath the Integrated Secretariat — as propaganda that had since been 'completely exposed.' Whether the Chief Minister accepts the judicial probe challenge or presses ahead with a government-constituted inquiry is now the central political question in Telangana.

Point of View

And BRS has raised the stakes by calling for a symmetrical judicial probe that covers both families. The significant detail here is the '67 acres' concession — Reddy's own Assembly remarks effectively deflated his long-running '1,000-acre' attack line, handing the BRS an obvious counter-narrative. The real question is whether either side genuinely wants a sitting-judge inquiry, or whether the challenge is theatrical positioning ahead of what BRS frames as a governance accountability reckoning. With the opposition suspended from the House and the Monsoon Session contested, the asset row risks overshadowing substantive welfare delivery questions that directly affect Telangana voters.
NationPress
17 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What has BRS demanded regarding the family assets inquiry in Telangana?
BRS Working President K.T. Rama Rao has demanded a comprehensive inquiry by a sitting High Court or Supreme Court judge into the family assets of both BRS chief KCR and CM Revanth Reddy, covering their holdings from birth. He specifically rejected SITs or special teams constituted by the state government as credible inquiry bodies.
Why did KT Rama Rao issue this challenge on 17 September?
Rama Rao was responding to CM Revanth Reddy's announcement in the Telangana Assembly on Wednesday that an inquiry would be conducted into KCR's landholdings. BRS countered by demanding the inquiry be extended to cover both families and be conducted by an independent judicial authority.
How much land does KCR actually hold, according to the Assembly?
CM Revanth Reddy himself admitted in the Assembly that KCR's land holding stands at 67 acres — significantly less than the '1,000-acre farmhouse' figure the Chief Minister had repeatedly cited earlier. Rama Rao used this admission to question the accuracy of the government's previous claims.
What is the background of KCR's ancestral property, according to BRS?
According to Rama Rao, KCR was born in 1954 into a landlord family in Chintamadaka whose ancestors owned hundreds of acres. Part of the original holding in Konapur was acquired for an irrigation project in the 1930s, and the compensation was used to purchase land in Chintamadaka where the family later settled.
What broader political grievances did BRS raise alongside the asset dispute?
BRS alleged that 420 electoral guarantees made by the Congress government have gone unfulfilled after 1,000 days in office, and accused CM Reddy of engineering the suspension of the BRS legislature party to avoid accountability. Rama Rao demanded the Monsoon Session be extended by a month and the suspensions revoked.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 7 months ago
  3. 8 months ago
  4. 10 months ago
  5. 10 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google