Calcutta HC grants Parambrata Chatterjee interim protection from arrest

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Calcutta HC grants Parambrata Chatterjee interim protection from arrest

Synopsis

Actor Parambrata Chatterjee secured interim protection from arrest from the Calcutta High Court after a viral video of him alleging he was pressured to back the Trinamool Congress government triggered an FIR. The case puts a spotlight on post-poll accountability politics in West Bengal — and on how quickly public figures can find themselves in legal jeopardy for statements made at political gatherings.

Key Takeaways

The Calcutta High Court granted actor Parambrata Chatterjee interim protection from arrest on 29 May .
The FIR was registered at Gariahat Police Station , alleging a provocative social media statement and instigation of post-poll violence after the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections .
Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee directed Chatterjee to cooperate with the police probe, which will continue despite the interim relief.
Kolkata Police must submit a detailed report at the next hearing.
Actress Swastika Mukherjee faces a separate FIR in the same matter; she appeared for questioning on 23 May .
The FIR followed a viral video in which Chatterjee alleged he was pressured by former minister Aroop Biswas and his brother Swarup Biswas to support the TMC government.

The Calcutta High Court on Friday, 29 May granted actor Parambrata Chatterjee interim protection from coercive police action, including arrest, in connection with an FIR lodged against him at Gariahat Police Station under the South Division of Kolkata Police. The FIR accuses the actor of making a provocative social media statement and allegedly instigating post-poll violence following the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections.

What the Court Ordered

A single-judge vacation bench of Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee heard the matter in the afternoon and, at the conclusion of the hearing, granted the interim relief sought by Chatterjee. The court, however, made clear that the police investigation will continue unimpeded.

Justice Mukherjee directed Parambrata Chatterjee to fully cooperate with investigators during the probe. Kolkata Police has also been asked to submit a detailed status report on the matter at the next date of hearing.

Background: The FIR and the Complaint

The FIR was filed on the basis of a complaint lodged by Joydeep Sen, an advocate. A separate FIR was simultaneously registered against actress Swastika Mukherjee — daughter of the late veteran Bengali actor Santu Mukherjee — for allegedly endorsing the same social media post flagged in the complaint.

While Swastika Mukherjee responded to a notice of interrogation and appeared at Gariahat Police Station on 23 May for questioning, Chatterjee did not comply with the notice. Instead, he approached the Calcutta High Court on 27 May with a plea seeking to quash the FIR entirely.

The Viral Statement That Triggered the Complaint

The controversy stems from remarks Chatterjee made at a meeting convened by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MLA and Bengali actor Rudranil Ghosh at Technicians Studio. Chatterjee, who was present at the gathering, alleged that he had been compelled to support the previous Trinamool Congress (TMC) government under pressure from former state minister Aroop Biswas and his brother Swarup Biswas.

In remarks that were captured on video and circulated widely, Chatterjee said: 'That day, I did everything by looking at the face of my newborn child and gritting my teeth. There was no other way. I did not come here to take personal revenge against anyone. But since I consider you a family member, I shared the personal insult. May such a situation not arise in the future.'

The video clip went viral on social media, drawing sharp criticism from several quarters who accused the actor of switching political allegiances. The complaint against him followed shortly after.

What Happens Next

Chatterjee's petition seeking to quash the FIR remains pending before the vacation bench. The court's interim protection shields him from arrest in the interim, but the investigation by Kolkata Police will proceed. The next hearing, at which the police report is due, will be a key moment in determining whether the FIR survives judicial scrutiny.

Point of View

But the underlying FIR raises a harder question: if the allegations of coercion are true, the complainant's target may be the wrong person. Mainstream coverage has focused on the 'colour-changing' narrative; what it misses is the structural pressure that artists in Bengal routinely face from whichever party holds power.
NationPress
14 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was an FIR filed against Parambrata Chatterjee?
An FIR was filed against Parambrata Chatterjee at Gariahat Police Station, Kolkata, on the basis of a complaint by advocate Joydeep Sen. The complaint alleged that Chatterjee made a provocative social media statement and instigated post-poll violence following the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections.
What did the Calcutta High Court order?
A vacation bench of Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee granted Chatterjee interim protection from coercive police action, including arrest, on 29 May. The court also directed him to cooperate with the ongoing police investigation and asked Kolkata Police to file a detailed report at the next hearing.
What is the viral statement that led to the complaint?
At a meeting organised by BJP MLA Rudranil Ghosh at Technicians Studio, Chatterjee alleged he was pressured to support the previous TMC government by former minister Aroop Biswas and his brother Swarup Biswas. A video of the remarks circulated widely and drew criticism before the complaint was filed.
Is actress Swastika Mukherjee also facing legal action?
Yes, a separate FIR was registered against Swastika Mukherjee for allegedly endorsing the same social media post cited in the complaint against Chatterjee. Unlike Chatterjee, she appeared at Gariahat Police Station for questioning on 23 May.
What happens next in the case?
Chatterjee's petition seeking to quash the FIR remains pending before the Calcutta High Court vacation bench. Kolkata Police must submit a detailed status report at the next hearing, and the investigation will continue despite the interim protection granted to the actor.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 8 months ago
  6. 11 months ago
  7. 11 months ago
  8. 11 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google