Kerala CPI(M) MP writes to Amit Shah over Delhi Police 'intimidation' of student

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Kerala CPI(M) MP writes to Amit Shah over Delhi Police 'intimidation' of student

Synopsis

Kerala CPI(M) MP John Brittas has escalated a complaint to Home Minister Amit Shah, alleging that Delhi Police intercepted a postgraduate student at a gym, coerced her into revealing her phone contents, and placed her under live-location surveillance — all apparently to prevent her from attending a protest march. The incident raises sharp constitutional questions about pre-emptive policing and civil liberties.

Key Takeaways

John Brittas , CPI(M) Rajya Sabha MP from Kerala, wrote to Home Minister Amit Shah on 9 June over the alleged incident.
Aahana Singh Kaith was allegedly intercepted by New Rajinder Nagar Police Station personnel on 5 June while at a gym in New Delhi.
Police allegedly questioned her about political links, pressured her to reveal mobile phone contents, and directed her to share her live location .
The incident was reportedly connected to a protest march by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) scheduled for 6 June .
Brittas has demanded a time-bound, impartial inquiry and action if constitutional safeguards are found to have been violated.
Former MP Brinda Karat had earlier filed a complaint with the Delhi Police Commissioner over the same incident.

Communist Party of India (Marxist) Rajya Sabha member John Brittas has written to Union Home Minister Amit Shah demanding an inquiry into the alleged intimidation of a young postgraduate student by the Delhi Police on 5 June 2025. The letter follows a formal complaint by senior CPI(M) leader and former MP Brinda Karat to the Delhi Police Commissioner regarding the alleged treatment of Aahana Singh Kaith, daughter of Daleep Singh Kaith.

What Allegedly Happened on 5 June

According to Karat's complaint, Aahana Singh was allegedly intercepted by personnel from the New Rajinder Nagar Police Station in New Delhi while she was at a gym. She was then reportedly taken to another location, where officers began questioning her about her political affiliations, friends, and acquaintances.

Police personnel allegedly asked whether she intended to participate in a protest march organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) on 6 June. According to the complaint, she was held under duress as questioning intensified.

Allegations of Coercion and Surveillance

In his letter to the Home Minister, Brittas quoted the alleged sequence of events in detail. 'She was repeatedly warned against participating in the demonstration, questioned regarding others who might attend and pressured to divulge information about potential participants,' he wrote. He further alleged that she was initially directed to hand over her mobile phone, and when she objected, was 'subjected to continued pressure and was ultimately compelled to reveal the contents of her mobile phone and private communications.'

Brittas added that even after she denied any intention to join the protest, she was reportedly 'placed under continuous surveillance and monitoring, directed to share her live location and effectively prevented from moving freely, causing considerable fear, distress and anxiety.'

What Brittas Has Demanded

The Kerala MP has urged Home Minister Shah to direct the Delhi Police to conduct a 'time-bound and impartial inquiry' into the incident. He has also asked authorities to determine whether similar actions were taken against others connected to the protest, and to initiate appropriate action if any infringement of constitutional safeguards is established.

Broader Context

The complaint arrives amid recurring concerns over the use of pre-emptive police action ahead of political demonstrations in the capital. Critics argue that intercepting individuals before a protest — and compelling them to share phone contents or live locations — raises serious questions about civil liberties and the right to peaceful assembly guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. This is not the first time opposition leaders have raised such concerns with Delhi Police conduct around protest events.

The Delhi Police has not issued a public response to the allegations as of the time of writing. Further developments are expected as the Home Ministry reviews Brittas's formal communication.

Point of View

If substantiated, go well beyond routine policing — compelling a citizen to share live location and phone contents without an arrest or formal detention is a serious constitutional question, not a procedural footnote. What makes this incident notable is the alleged pre-emptive nature: action taken not after a crime but before a protest, targeting someone on the basis of suspected attendance. Opposition parties have raised similar concerns before, but the pattern of complaints is becoming harder to dismiss as isolated. The Home Ministry's response — or silence — will itself be telling.
NationPress
12 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Delhi Police student intimidation case about?
It involves the alleged interception and coercive questioning of postgraduate student Aahana Singh Kaith by Delhi Police on 5 June 2025, reportedly to prevent her from attending a protest march the following day. CPI(M) leaders have written to both the Delhi Police Commissioner and the Union Home Minister demanding an inquiry.
Who is John Brittas and why did he write to Amit Shah?
John Brittas is a CPI(M) Rajya Sabha member from Kerala and a former journalist. He wrote to Home Minister Amit Shah after senior party colleague Brinda Karat filed a complaint with the Delhi Police Commissioner over the alleged treatment of Aahana Singh Kaith, seeking a time-bound and impartial inquiry.
What specific actions does Brittas allege Delhi Police took against the student?
According to his letter, police allegedly warned the student against joining a protest, pressured her to reveal her phone contents and private communications, and directed her to share her live location — effectively placing her under surveillance and restricting her movement.
What has Brittas demanded from the Home Ministry?
Brittas has asked the Home Minister to direct Delhi Police to conduct a time-bound and impartial inquiry, investigate whether similar actions were taken against other individuals linked to the protest, and initiate action if any constitutional safeguards are found to have been violated.
Has Delhi Police responded to the allegations?
As of the time of writing, Delhi Police has not issued a public response to the allegations made by Brinda Karat or John Brittas. The matter is pending review by the Home Ministry.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 days ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 2 weeks ago
  5. 2 weeks ago
  6. 2 weeks ago
  7. 11 months ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google