Why Was Punjab's DSP Suspended for Bribery?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant move against corruption, Punjab's DSP Rajanpal has been suspended for attempting to bribe a senior police official. This incident highlights the state's commitment to integrity within law enforcement. Discover the details surrounding this case and what it means for the future of policing in Punjab.
Key Takeaways
- Punjab government enforces strict anti-corruption measures.
- DSP Rajanpal suspended for bribery attempt.
- Criminal case filed under Prevention of Corruption Act.
- Commitment to integrity within the police force emphasized.
- Previous cases of police misconduct highlight ongoing challenges.
Chandigarh, July 4 (NationPress) In an embodiment of the Punjab government’s unwavering stance against corruption, Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Crime Against Women (CAW) Rajanpal, stationed in Faridkot, has been suspended for attempting to bribe the office of the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP).
According to reports, a few days prior, the SSP Faridkot received a complaint against DSP Rajanpal, where the complainant accused him of accepting money to resolve a matrimonial dispute and sought action against him.
Revealing further details, an official spokesperson of the Punjab Police indicated that DSP Rajanpal attempted to offer a bribe of Rs 1 lakh to the SSP’s office to dismiss the complaint lodged against him.
In a decisive move, the spokesperson noted that the Faridkot Police have initiated a criminal case against the implicated DSP and have apprehended him. Rigorous departmental proceedings will be initiated against the officer in accordance with Punjab Civil Services regulations, he added.
“The Punjab government is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accountability within the police force. Any officer found engaging in corrupt activities will face severe legal and disciplinary repercussions,” stated the spokesperson. In this context, a case has been filed under Sections 7 and 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act at Police Station City Faridkot.
The arrest of the police official follows two days after the Vigilance Bureau detained Head Constable Raj Kumar, who was serving as the assistant reader to the DSP of Bhucho, Ravinder Singh. He was caught red-handed accepting a bribe of Rs 1 lakh.
A case under the Prevention of Corruption Act was filed at the Vigilance Bureau’s police station in the Bathinda range. Similarly, DSP Harbans Singh Dhaliwal, who was serving as DSP in Bathinda, was suspended last month for purported misconduct in managing organized crime cases.
Point of View
I see this incident as a crucial reminder of the ongoing challenges within law enforcement. The commitment shown by the Punjab government to uphold integrity is commendable, but it is vital to ensure that such actions lead to systemic change rather than isolated punishment. NationPress remains dedicated to reporting on these important issues.
NationPress
17/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to the suspension of DSP Rajanpal?
DSP Rajanpal was suspended for attempting to bribe the Senior Superintendent of Police in an effort to settle a complaint against him regarding accepting money for resolving a matrimonial dispute.
What actions were taken against DSP Rajanpal?
Faridkot Police registered a criminal case against DSP Rajanpal, arrested him, and initiated strict departmental proceedings against him as per Punjab Civil Services rules.
What does this incident indicate about Punjab's stance on corruption?
This incident illustrates the Punjab government's zero-tolerance policy towards corruption, emphasizing their commitment to maintaining integrity within the police force.
Have there been other recent cases of police corruption in Punjab?
Yes, just days before DSP Rajanpal's suspension, Head Constable Raj Kumar was arrested for accepting a bribe. This highlights ongoing issues within law enforcement in the region.
What legal action is expected against DSP Rajanpal?
DSP Rajanpal is expected to face legal proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act, along with departmental action for his misconduct.
