ED attaches ₹24.60 crore Rourkela mall in Odisha money laundering case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
ED attaches ₹24.60 crore Rourkela mall in Odisha money laundering case

Synopsis

The ED has frozen a commercial mall in Rourkela worth ₹24.60 crore, tracing the funds back to allegedly fraudulent loans of over ₹35 crore siphoned from PEC Limited — a Union government enterprise — through a web of shell-company transfers, share-purchase payments, and layered bank transactions involving Hanuman Khedaria and his associated entities.

Key Takeaways

The ED, Bhubaneswar Zonal Office provisionally attached ₹24.60 crore worth of property on 3 November 2026 under the PMLA, 2002 .
The attached asset is floors of Pluto Plaza Mall, Chhend, Rourkela , owned by M/s Pluto Plaza Private Limited , controlled by Hanuman Khedaria .
M/s Maa Tarini Industries Limited (MTIL) allegedly obtained ₹19.40 crore fraudulently from PEC Limited ; related firm TEPL availed another ₹16 crore .
Total outstanding liability to PEC Limited stood at approximately ₹56.89 crore including interest when the loan turned NPA.
Funds were allegedly diverted to pay share-purchase consideration to erstwhile MTIL shareholders, including Khedaria , who received proceeds of approximately ₹15.31 crore .
The case originated from a CBI, ACB Bhubaneswar FIR invoking the IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Bhubaneswar Zonal Office, has provisionally attached immovable property worth ₹24.60 crore under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, in a money laundering case linked to M/s Maa Tarini Industries Limited (MTIL) and associated entities. The attached asset is the ground floor, first floor, and part of the second floor of Pluto Plaza Mall, located at Chhend, Rourkela in Odisha, held in the name of M/s Pluto Plaza Private Limited, a company controlled by Hanuman Khedaria.

Background and Origin of the Case

The ED's investigation was triggered by an FIR registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB), Bhubaneswar, under provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The FIR named MTIL, its directors, and officials of PEC Limited — a Government of India enterprise under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry.

According to the ED, MTIL allegedly colluded with certain PEC Limited officials to fraudulently secure financial assistance of ₹19.40 crore for the procurement of iron ore, by misrepresenting its financial standing and concealing existing charges over its assets. A related firm, M/s Tathagat Exports Private Limited (TEPL), reportedly availed an additional ₹16 crore from PEC Limited under similar circumstances.

Scale of Alleged Fraud

The ED noted that the total outstanding liability towards PEC Limited — including interest accrued at the time the loan turned non-performing — stood at approximately ₹56.89 crore. Investigators found that funds drawn from PEC Limited were routed through the bank accounts of both MTIL and TEPL and subsequently used to pay share purchase consideration to the erstwhile shareholders of MTIL, among whom was Hanuman Khedaria.

How the Proceeds Were Laundered

The ED's probe established that Khedaria and his associated entities received proceeds of approximately ₹15.31 crore. When a proportionate interest component was factored in, the total traced to him amounted to ₹24.60 crore — the precise figure now attached. According to the agency, these funds were subsequently layered through multiple bank accounts and deployed across cash withdrawals, investments, and business expenses, constituting a classic money laundering trail under the PMLA framework.

What the Attachment Means

'Accordingly, immovable property worth ₹24.60 crore belonging to M/s Pluto Plaza Private Limited has been provisionally attached as value equivalent to the proceeds of crime under the PMLA, 2002,' the ED said in its statement on Tuesday, 3 November 2026. A provisional attachment under PMLA freezes the property from being sold, transferred, or otherwise disposed of, pending adjudication before the Adjudicating Authority. This comes amid a sustained nationwide ED drive targeting diversion of government-backed credit lines, particularly those involving public sector enterprises like PEC Limited.

What Happens Next

The provisional attachment order will be placed before the PMLA Adjudicating Authority, which will determine whether the attachment should be confirmed. If upheld, the property remains frozen for the duration of the trial. The accused may challenge the order before the authority or appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. Given the involvement of a government enterprise and alleged corruption by its officials, the case is also expected to continue on the CBI's criminal track simultaneously.

Point of View

Not just external fraud — and the CBI's parallel criminal case will test how deep that institutional failure ran. The ₹56.89 crore total exposure versus the ₹24.60 crore attached also signals that the ED has more ground to cover.
NationPress
3 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What property has the ED attached in the Odisha money laundering case?
The ED has provisionally attached the ground floor, first floor, and part of the second floor of Pluto Plaza Mall in Chhend, Rourkela, Odisha, valued at ₹24.60 crore. The property is registered in the name of M/s Pluto Plaza Private Limited, a company controlled by Hanuman Khedaria.
What is M/s Maa Tarini Industries Limited accused of?
MTIL is accused of fraudulently obtaining ₹19.40 crore in financial assistance from PEC Limited — a Government of India enterprise — by misrepresenting its financial position and concealing existing charges on its assets. The case was first registered by the CBI's Anti-Corruption Branch in Bhubaneswar.
How were the laundered funds traced to Hanuman Khedaria?
The ED found that funds diverted from PEC Limited through MTIL and TEPL bank accounts were used to pay share-purchase consideration to erstwhile MTIL shareholders, including Khedaria. He and his associated entities allegedly received approximately ₹15.31 crore in proceeds, which with a proportionate interest component totalled ₹24.60 crore.
What happens after a provisional attachment under PMLA?
A provisional PMLA attachment is placed before the Adjudicating Authority, which decides whether to confirm it. If confirmed, the property remains frozen for the duration of the trial. The accused can challenge the order before the authority or appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
What is PEC Limited and why is it significant in this case?
PEC Limited is a Government of India trading enterprise under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. Its alleged role as the source of fraudulently obtained credit — totalling a combined ₹35.40 crore across MTIL and TEPL, with total outstanding liability at ₹56.89 crore — makes it central to both the ED's money laundering probe and the CBI's separate corruption case against its officials.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 weeks ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 4 months ago
  6. 6 months ago
  7. 7 months ago
  8. 8 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google