CM Fadnavis chairs SC/ST Atrocities Act review, orders fast-track courts
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Chief Minister's Office of Maharashtra announced on Friday, 3 July 2026 that Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis chaired a high-level meeting of the State-Level High Power Vigilance and Monitoring Committee at Vidhan Bhavan, Mumbai, to review implementation of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and directed a focused push to raise conviction rates in atrocity cases.
Context
The meeting of the State-Level High Power Vigilance and Monitoring Committee — constituted under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act to periodically review case registration, investigation and conviction rates — brought together Member of Parliament Dr. Hemant Savara, other legislators, and senior state officials. CM Fadnavis directed that conviction rates under the 'Atrocity Act' (ॲट्रॉसिटी कायदा) be increased and that the role of public prosecutors in securing convictions under special laws be reflected in their performance evaluations.
The CM also directed that a proposal be prepared to introduce a provision — modelled on the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita — allowing a maximum of two instances of compromise or settlement in any case, so that accused persons in atrocity cases cannot escape conviction through repeated settlements. He said similar two-settlement limits should be incorporated into special laws as well.
Policy Backdrop
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — substantially amended in 2015 to expand the list of offences and strengthen enforcement — mandates states to constitute vigilance and monitoring committees and hold periodic reviews. Maharashtra's committee is required to meet at regular intervals to assess ground-level implementation. Persistently low national conviction rates in atrocity cases have long driven calls for procedural reform, and the post-2015 amendments placed greater emphasis on victim-centric implementation.
CM Fadnavis directed that the Home Department's MARVEL institute study the reasons for low conviction rates — including weak evidence, breaks in the chain of events, and witness turning hostile — and develop a standardised operating procedure covering the period from case registration to filing of the charge sheet in court. He also directed that court hearings in cases filed under this Act be video-recorded as provided under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, to reduce witness tampering.
Stakeholders and Impact
CM Fadnavis ordered the establishment of fast-track courts in districts with the highest incidence of atrocity cases, to accelerate trial outcomes and deliver justice to victims sooner after case registration. He named Solapur, Ahilyanagar, Parbhani, Nanded and Yavatmal as districts where police must investigate and report on the reasons behind the higher volume of registered atrocity crimes, and directed that false cases, if identified after investigation, should not be filed.
On victim relief, the CMO stated that under the Atrocities Act, 4,524 victims received financial assistance in 2025-26, with a fund disbursement of ₹53.57 crore. In 2026-27, 2,081 victims have so far received ₹27.40 crore in aid. The CMO also noted that the dedicated helpline 14566 accepts complaints under the Act, and that 282 complaints received on the helpline were disposed of before 1 June 2026. A witness protection programme was also directed for cases involving serious offences such as murder, rape, and robbery filed under the Act.
CM Fadnavis further directed that workshops be held across the state with a primary focus on training officers at the Sub-Divisional Police Officer (SDPO) level, since the SDPO is the designated investigating officer under this Act. District-level coordination between enforcement agencies and public prosecutors is to be strengthened.
What's Next
The CM directed that state-level review meetings under this Act be held every six months — alternately chaired by the Chief Minister and the Director General of Police. The immediate priorities are the rollout of fast-track courts in the five high-incidence districts, submission of police analytical reports on case failures, and the MARVEL institute's development of a standardised investigation-to-prosecution procedure. These steps will be the key markers of whether Maharashtra translates this meeting's directives into measurable improvements in conviction rates for atrocity cases.