Did the Court Grant Bail to Gaganpreet Kaur in the Delhi BMW Accident?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Gaganpreet Kaur granted bail by the court.
- Ambulance driver criticized for negligence.
- Accident resulted in the death of a Finance Ministry official.
- CCTV footage plays a crucial role in the case.
- Legal implications of culpable homicide discussed.
New Delhi, Sep 27 (NationPress) In the tragic Delhi BMW accident that led to the demise of a Finance Ministry official, a local court has granted bail to the accused driver, Gaganpreet Kaur. The court expressed disapproval regarding the actions of an ambulance driver who, despite arriving at the scene shortly after the incident, failed to assist the victims.
Judicial Magistrate Ankit Garg approved bail for Gaganpreet Kaur, aged 38, against a bond of Rs 1 lakh.
During the proceedings, the court had previously reserved judgment on the bail request, prompting inquiries into the police's response concerning the ambulance driver. The driver was en route to a hospital to collect a body when they passed the accident scene but did not stop to offer aid to the victims of the BMW crash that occurred on September 14.
Upon reviewing CCTV footage from the site, the court expressed dissatisfaction that the ambulance driver, who arrived within 30 seconds, neglected to help Navjot Singh, a Ministry of Finance officer, and his wife, but instead departed to fulfill their original task.
The court rebuked the police for their inaction and allowed the ambulance driver to leave. It stated that the driver’s conduct could be classified as culpable homicide, though not murder.
Gaganpreet Kaur was presented in court as her judicial custody concluded on Saturday. She faces allegations of culpable homicide not amounting to murder and reckless driving.
The fatal incident transpired in the Dhaula Kuan area earlier this month, where Gaganpreet Kaur reportedly collided her BMW with a motorcycle, resulting in severe injuries and the eventual death of the senior finance official, alongside serious injuries to his spouse.
During the previous hearing, the prosecution raised several compelling points. They contended that the BMW was exceeding the speed limit at the time of the crash and questioned the post-accident handling.
Interestingly, the injured parties were not taken to the closest medical facility, although several were nearby. Instead, they were transported to Nulife Hospital in GTB Nagar, North Delhi, which is allegedly linked to one of Gaganpreet Kaur’s relatives. The prosecution indicated this could signify an attempt to alter medical evidence or evade thorough investigation.
The Investigating Officer (IO) provided the CCTV recording from the day of the incident, which the magistrate evaluated during the session. This footage is anticipated to be vital in clarifying the events leading up to the tragic accident.