Ashok Gehlot Warns of Constitutional Crisis in Rajasthan Over Local Body Poll Delays

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ashok Gehlot Warns of Constitutional Crisis in Rajasthan Over Local Body Poll Delays

Synopsis

Ashok Gehlot accuses the BJP government in Rajasthan of leading the state into a constitutional crisis by delaying local body elections for over a year. He emphasizes the significance of timely elections under constitutional mandates and calls the situation a direct threat to democracy.

Key Takeaways

Ashok Gehlot criticized the state government for delaying local elections.
He termed the situation a "constitutional crisis" .
Delays violate constitutional articles regarding election timelines.
The Rajasthan High Court has issued repeated directives on the matter.
Public accountability is crucial for democracy.

Jaipur, April 8 (NationPress) Senior Congress figure Ashok Gehlot has criticized the BJP-led government in Rajasthan, stating it is steering the state into a "constitutional crisis" by neglecting to hold elections for Panchayats and Urban Local Bodies for more than a year. In a pointed statement, Gehlot asserted that this delay and the appointment of bureaucrats instead of elected officials highlight an "undemocratic mindset", which he claims is a direct attack on democratic institutions.

According to Gehlot, the inability to conduct timely elections is not simply an administrative oversight but a breach of constitutional mandates. He noted that Articles 243E and 243U clearly stipulate five-year terms and the necessity of timely elections for both Panchayats and Urban Local Bodies, while Article 243K assigns this duty to an independent State Election Commission.

He emphasized, "When a government systematically violates Articles 243E, 243U, and 243K of the Constitution, restricts the citizens' voting rights for over a year, and ignores the clear orders from the Court, it transcends mere administrative failure and signifies a definitive instance of 'Constitutional Breakdown'."

Gehlot further accused the state government of attempting to delay elections under various pretexts such as delimitation, reorganization, and the 'One State, One Election' initiative, despite the Supreme Court's ruling in the Vikas Kishanrao Gawali (2021) case, which declared that such justifications cannot postpone elections.

He highlighted that even after repeated directives from the Rajasthan High Court in 2025, the government has failed to comply. "The Rajasthan High Court issued multiple orders in February, March, and November 2025, yet the government ignored them each time. Ultimately, the Court set a firm deadline of April 15, 2026, while also upholding this directive through the dismissal of a Special Leave Petition (SLP), indicating the judiciary's unequivocal stance. However, the government's lack of seriousness remains apparent," he stated.

Gehlot warned that even after the final deadline of April 15, 2026, was established and the Supreme Court supported the order by dismissing the SLP, the government's indifference is striking.

Describing the situation as a "constitutional breakdown", Gehlot asserted that the prolonged denial of voting rights and dismissal of judicial orders jeopardize the essence of democracy. "The principles of the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments, which advocate for decentralization and local self-governance, are being undermined. Democracy entails not merely wielding power but also being accountable to the Constitution," he remarked.

Gehlot firmly stated that the people of Rajasthan “will not passively tolerate the infringement of their rights.”

Point of View

The statements made by Ashok Gehlot highlight significant concerns regarding the democratic process in Rajasthan. The failure to hold timely elections raises questions about governance and accountability, which are essential for upholding constitutional values.
NationPress
10 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key articles mentioned by Gehlot?
Gehlot refers to Articles 243E, 243U, and 243K of the Constitution, which mandate timely elections and establish the role of the State Election Commission.
What reasons did the government provide for delaying elections?
The government cited reasons such as delimitation, reorganization, and the 'One State, One Election' initiative for postponing elections.
What did the Rajasthan High Court direct regarding elections?
The Rajasthan High Court issued multiple directives in 2025 for holding elections and set a final deadline of April 15, 2026.
How does Gehlot describe the current situation?
Gehlot describes the situation as a 'constitutional breakdown' and emphasizes the violation of citizens' voting rights.
What is the public sentiment regarding this issue?
Gehlot asserts that the people of Rajasthan will not tolerate the infringement of their rights.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 weeks ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 10 months ago
  4. 11 months ago
  5. 12 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google