CBI arrests Parliament job racket offender after 16-year manhunt
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Wednesday, 20 August arrested Jitendra Pathak, a proclaimed offender wanted in a Parliament job fraud case dating back to 2009, from Ludhiana, Punjab. Pathak had allegedly impersonated a Lok Sabha Secretariat employee and accepted a bribe of ₹50,000 from a youth seeking employment in Parliament — and had evaded law enforcement for over 16 years.
Background of the Case
The CBI registered the case on 13 July 2009 against Pathak and others for cheating a private individual by falsely promising a Parliament job in exchange for ₹50,000. Following completion of the investigation, a charge sheet was filed in December 2009, naming Pathak and at least one other accused.
However, Pathak never appeared before the trial court after the charge sheet was filed. Despite what the CBI described as “persistent and sustained efforts” to trace him, he remained untraceable for years. The trial court formally declared him a proclaimed offender on 28 September 2016 — nearly seven years after the original FIR.
How the CBI Tracked Him Down
Field verification inputs eventually revealed that Pathak had been hiding in Ludhiana. The CBI conducted what it described as a “meticulous operation, duly supported by technical analysis,” leading to his successful apprehension on Wednesday. The arrest closes a prolonged fugitive phase that spanned three terms of the Lok Sabha and two decades of legal proceedings.
Separate Bribery Arrest in Panipat
In an unrelated case on the same day, the CBI arrested an Assistant Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) posted at the Office of Joint DGFT in Panipat, Haryana. The official allegedly demanded a bribe of ₹30,000 from a complainant to clear a deficiency and process an Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) authorisation file on behalf of the complainant’s client.
The CBI laid a trap and caught the accused public servant in the act of demanding and accepting the bribe of ₹30,000, according to the agency’s statement.
What Happens Next
Pathak is expected to be produced before the trial court, which will resume proceedings that were stalled by his prolonged absence. The Panipat DGFT official faces prosecution under anti-corruption statutes. Both cases underscore the CBI’s ongoing focus on public-servant accountability and long-pending fugitive recoveries.