Kochi, Feb 24 (NationPress) The Kerala High Court is set to screen the film 'The Kerala Story 2' on Wednesday as part of its proceedings regarding a petition that raises significant concerns about the film's depiction of events presented as a “true story”.

Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas, presiding over the case, has opted to watch the film himself prior to making any further decisions.

The petitioners argue that their worries cannot be overlooked, especially since the film is marketed as being inspired by actual incidents.

The plea states that presenting the film as a true story adds credibility to its storyline and could influence public opinion.

Furthermore, the petitioners assert that if the portrayal is misleading or exaggerated, it could have broader social ramifications.

They are seeking judicial review to determine if the film’s content necessitates regulatory oversight.

During the initial hearing, the Court acknowledged that the issues raised require thorough examination and that viewing the film would provide valuable context for assessing the complaints.

The case is now scheduled for further hearings following the judge's viewing of the film.

This development occurs amidst ongoing discussions about the boundaries of cinematic freedom and creative expression, particularly when films assert to be based on real events.

In previous instances, courts have balanced artistic freedom with the potential effects of controversial narratives on societal order and communal peace.

While the filmmakers argue that their project is a valid creative endeavor, the petitioners claim that the assertion of it being a “true story” amplifies the filmmakers' obligation to maintain factual accuracy.

The High Court's decision to view the film before issuing any interim ruling indicates a measured judicial stance.

The case is anticipated to be revisited later this week after the screening.

Kerala BJP President, Rajeev Chandrasekhar, has consistently advocated for the freedom of expression. Conversely, the Congress and the ruling Left parties share a unified stance on this matter.

Congress MP Shashi Tharoor criticized the sequel’s creators, asserting that, similar to the original film, it propagates divisive narratives lacking a factual basis, potentially inciting societal hatred.

Tharoor described the first installment as a “hate-mongering film” devoid of substantiation, disputing claims of widespread religious conversions and arguing that the figures presented were inflated.