Manipur: Kuki-Zo Council renews UT demand, urges Centre for political talks
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Kuki-Zo Council (KZC), the apex body of the Kuki-Zo tribal community in Manipur, on Monday, 13 July 2026, reiterated its demand for a Separate Administration in the form of a Union Territory with a Legislature, asserting it remains the only viable path to lasting peace, justice, and the protection of the community's rights and identity. The demand was pressed at a media interaction in New Delhi, signalling the Council's intent to escalate its case directly before the Centre.
KZC's Core Demand and Political Stance
KZC Chairman Henlianthang Thanglet, flanked by Council Spokesperson Ginza Vualzong and Vice Chairmen Len Mate and Yanglet Haokip, stated that the ethnic crisis in Manipur cannot be resolved through security measures alone. He urged the government to expedite meaningful political dialogue to address what the Council describes as the legitimate aspirations of the Kuki-Zo people. The Council called on the Centre to recognise the gravity of the situation and address not only immediate security concerns but also the deeper political issues stemming from the prolonged ethnic conflict.
Scale of Violence: Civilian Casualties and Displaced Communities
Thanglet alleged that over the past three years, Kuki-Zo people have faced repeated attacks by members of both the Meitei and Naga communities. He said their people have been killed, homes looted and burned, places of worship desecrated, and tens of thousands displaced from their ancestral lands. He added that despite repeated appeals and a change in the Manipur state government, acts of violence, intimidation, and deprivation continue.
Spokesperson Vualzong provided more specific figures, claiming that since March 2026, at least 15 Kuki-Zo civilians have been killed and around 55 houses across 14 Kuki-Zo villages have been set ablaze during the ongoing conflict involving Naga groups. He traced the present cycle of violence to an incident at Litan Sareikhong in February 2026, which the Council regards as the beginning of the latest phase of hostilities.
KZC Condemns Naga Hostage Killings, Flags Unequal Response
The Council unequivocally condemned the killing of six Manipur-Naga hostages, calling it tragic, unacceptable, and contrary to the principles upheld by the Kuki-Zo community. The KZC leaders stated the act was neither authorised nor endorsed by any Kuki-Zo political, social, or community leadership, and demanded that those responsible be identified and prosecuted through a fair, transparent, and impartial investigation.
At the same time, the Council expressed deep concern over what it described as a disparity in official and media responses. According to KZC leaders, while the killing of the six Naga hostages has received significant official attention and investigative focus, the alleged killing of 14 Kuki-Zo civilians, including three pastors, reportedly by Naga militants since 11 March 2026, has not received the same level of urgency or coverage. The Council stressed that justice must be impartial and consistent across all communities.
Five-Point Charter of Demands to the Centre
The KZC has submitted a five-point charter of demands to the Central government. These include a fair, impartial, and time-bound investigation into all incidents of violence — including the killing of 14 Kuki-Zo civilians and the burning of Kuki-Zo villages; unhindered access to healthcare for all citizens while ensuring the safety of Kuki-Zo patients in public institutions; and the reopening of all blocked routes to restore uninterrupted movement of food, medicines, fuel, and essential commodities to Kuki-Zo-inhabited areas. The Council also demanded strengthened security in vulnerable areas and effective measures to ensure the safe return of normalcy in conflict-affected regions.
What Comes Next
The KZC's public appeal in New Delhi marks a deliberate attempt to shift the Manipur crisis onto the national political agenda ahead of any resumed dialogue. Whether the Centre responds with a formal political process or continues to treat the conflict primarily as a law-and-order issue will determine the trajectory of one of India's most protracted ethnic conflicts. The Council has made clear that security deployments, without a political settlement, will not suffice.