Nanded Gurudwara Act postponed: Maharashtra defers 1956 amendment amid Sikh community pushback
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Maharashtra government has decided to postpone the implementation of proposed amendments to the Nanded Gurudwara Improvement Act, deferring the introduction of the revised legislation in the state legislature after significant concern from the Sikh community over the future management of the historic Sri Hazur Abchalnagar Sachkhand Gurudwara in Nanded. The decision was announced on Tuesday, 30 June by Revenue Minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule at a press conference in Mumbai.
What the Government Decided
On the directions of Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, the tabling of the amended Act in the legislature has been put on hold indefinitely. A high-level committee will now be constituted to formally consult the Sikh community, and the government has stated that no further legislative steps will be taken until those consultations are complete.
Revenue Minister Bawankule made the announcement in the presence of Dr Vijay Satbir Singh and other representatives of the Hazur Abchalnagar Sachkhand Gurudwara. He firmly rejected claims that the Maharashtra government intended to assume full administrative control of the Gurudwara, asserting that 'the entire management of the Gurudwara will be carried out only through the Sikh community.'
Background: The 1956 Act and Proposed Changes
The existing law governing the Gurudwara dates to 1956, enacted during the era of the erstwhile Hyderabad government. Given the significant changes in the number of devotees and administrative needs over the decades, the Justice (Retd.) Bhatia Committee had recommended a set of amendments to modernise the governance structure.
Under the proposed revisions, the Gurudwara Board would have been expanded from 17 to 21 members. Elected members would increase from 3 to 6, and the selection of the President and Vice-President — previously a government prerogative — would shift to internal elections among the 21 elected members. The government said its stated aim was to provide world-class facilities to the growing number of pilgrims and improve administrative transparency, not to exercise control.
Proposed Representation Structure
The revised board structure envisaged broad representation for Sikhs across Maharashtra: one member each from Vidarbha, Marathwada, and Western Maharashtra revenue divisions, and two from Konkan-Mumbai. Six members would represent Nanded locally. The board would also include retired IAS and IPS officers from the Sikh community, District Collectors, and Sikh MPs and MLAs. Notably, two members would be nominated by the SGPC (Amritsar), giving the apex Sikh religious body a direct stake in the Nanded shrine's governance.
Consultation Process Going Forward
A special committee comprising an Additional Chief Secretary, a Commissioner, and a District Collector has been formed to determine what provisions should be retained or dropped from the draft Act. This panel will engage with the Sachkhand Committee, incorporate its recommendations, and hold wide consultations with the broader Sikh community before a final draft is prepared.
This comes amid a broader pattern of state governments treading carefully on legislation affecting minority religious institutions, particularly when community sentiment mobilises quickly. With elections and coalition dynamics always in play in Maharashtra, the deferral signals the Fadnavis government's preference for consensus-building over legislative urgency.