Is the Principal Secretary of MP Assembly Approved for MPHRC? What About Others?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a pivotal meeting led by Chief Minister Mohan Yadav, the Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission's future hangs in the balance with only one name approved for a key position. As the state grapples with pending complaints, transparency in the selection process raises critical questions. What does this mean for justice in Madhya Pradesh?
Key Takeaways
- Only one member approved for the MPHRC.
- Concerns about transparency in the selection process.
- Over 4,500 complaints pending before the commission.
- Avdesh Pratap Singh to retire shortly.
- Importance of the commission as a beacon of justice.
Bhopal, Sep 29 (NationPress) A significant meeting was convened on Monday by a committee led by Chief Minister Mohan Yadav to discuss the selection of the Chairperson and members for the Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission (MPHRC).
In attendance were Madhya Pradesh Assembly Speaker Narendra Singh Tomar, Leader of Opposition (LoP) Umang Singhar, and other committee members at the Chief Minister's residence in Bhopal.
The committee aimed to finalize a chairperson and two members; however, only one member’s appointment was confirmed due to a lack of consensus on the remaining names, according to sources.
“The name of Avdesh Pratap Singh, the Principal Secretary of Madhya Pradesh Vidhan Sabha, has been approved as a member of the State Human Rights Commission. The selection of a chairperson and another member is currently on hold,” a source revealed.
Importantly, Avdesh Pratap Singh is scheduled to retire from service by September 30.
Congress MLA and LoP Umang Singhar expressed concerns to the media regarding the transparency of the selection process for the SHCR members.
“The Human Rights Commission serves as a beacon of justice and is integral to our Constitution. When the government and institutions falter in delivering justice, the Commission becomes the last refuge for the populace. Therefore, I emphasized that an unqualified individual should not be appointed as a member,” he stated.
This development follows the end of the tenure of Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission (MPHRC) Acting Chairperson Rajiv Tandon last Friday.
Reports indicate that over 4,500 complaints are currently pending before the MP Human Rights Commission.
Since the conclusion of Manohar Mamtani’s term as Chairman of the MPHRC, no successor has been named, and Rajiv Tandon has been serving as the Acting Chairman.
Point of View
The recent developments in the Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission highlight critical issues surrounding justice and transparency. The concerns raised by opposition leaders emphasize the need for a robust and trustworthy commission, especially at a time when numerous complaints await resolution. This situation calls for urgent attention to uphold the integrity of human rights in the state.
NationPress
29/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current status of the MPHRC appointments?
As of now, only Avdesh Pratap Singh's name has been approved for a member position in the Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission, while the appointments of a chairperson and another member are pending due to a lack of consensus.
Why are there concerns regarding the appointment process?
Concerns have been raised about the transparency of the selection process, with opposition leaders questioning the qualifications of potential appointees to ensure the integrity of the commission.
How many complaints are pending before the MPHRC?
There are currently over 4,500 complaints pending before the Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission, indicating significant pressure on the commission to address these issues.
Who is serving as the Acting Chairperson of MPHRC?
Rajiv Tandon is currently serving as the Acting Chairperson of the Madhya Pradesh Human Rights Commission after the previous chairman's term ended without a successor.
What is the significance of the Human Rights Commission?
The Human Rights Commission acts as a critical institution for justice, especially when governmental and institutional failures impede the delivery of justice to the populace.
