MSME Report 2026: ISED calls for de-risking framework, not just subsidies
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Institute of Small Enterprises and Development (ISED) has proposed a sweeping policy overhaul for India's micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs), arguing that the sector needs systematic protection from global economic shocks — not merely promotional schemes and subsidies. The proposal forms the centrepiece of the India MSME Report 2026, released in Kochi on 25 June 2025 by Mercy Epao, Joint Secretary in the Ministry of MSME.
The Core Argument: Enterprise Security as Economic Priority
At the heart of the report is the concept of enterprise security — a framework that positions the survival of MSMEs as a fundamental economic priority, comparable in principle to National Food Security. ISED contends that while all businesses face risks from economic downturns, geopolitical conflicts, and public health emergencies, small enterprises remain disproportionately exposed.
The report highlights what economists term asymmetric lagging vulnerability — a pattern where the full impact of a crisis on MSMEs surfaces only after a delay, as costs climb, demand weakens, and employment comes under pressure. Events such as the Covid-19 pandemic and ongoing tensions in West Asia are cited as evidence of this structural fragility.
Why Traditional Relief Measures Fall Short
According to ISED, emergency credit support schemes and other crisis-era interventions address only immediate challenges. The deeper structural weaknesses afflicting MSMEs — limited access to finance and technology, shrinking profit margins, and persistent market uncertainties — require a more durable policy response.
The institute notes that the current policy architecture, built largely around promotional subsidies, leaves small businesses exposed to cascading risks that a single-instrument approach cannot contain.
The Enterprise Security and Resilience Framework
To address these gaps, ISED has unveiled its Enterprise Security and Resilience Framework, which calls for coordinated action by governments, banks, insurance companies, and promotional agencies. The framework is designed to help entrepreneurs manage interconnected risks that threaten business viability before they become existential.
ISED Director Dr P.M. Mathew made the case for treating entrepreneurship as a public good. 'Entrepreneurship itself is a public good and deserves protection,' he said, arguing that governments must ensure access to affordable credit, technology, and market opportunities as critical public services.
Global and Sectoral Endorsements
Max Balakoviskiy of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) described the framework as an innovative contribution to global MSME policy discussions. Former Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) member Thomas Devasia stressed the need for closer convergence between banking and insurance services to support small enterprises — a gap that critics argue has long undermined MSME resilience in India.
What the Policy Shift Would Mean
The report's central message is that India must move decisively from merely promoting MSMEs to systematically de-risking them. The sector contributes significantly to employment, innovation, and economic growth — making its resilience a national economic concern, not just a sectoral one.
Whether the Ministry of MSME translates the framework into actionable policy will be the critical test in the months ahead.