Did Nagarjuna and Naga Chaitanya Record Statements in Defamation Case Against Telangana Minister?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant legal development, renowned actor Nagarjuna and his son Naga Chaitanya have recorded their statements in a defamation case against Telangana Minister Konda Surekha. The case arises from controversial comments made by the minister regarding Naga Chaitanya's divorce. This story unfolds with key insights into the implications for both the actors and the political landscape.
Key Takeaways
- Nagarjuna and Naga Chaitanya filed a defamation case against Minister Konda Surekha.
- The remarks made by the minister pertained to a personal family matter.
- Public figures must exercise caution in their statements regarding personal issues.
- The case highlights the balance between public commentary and personal privacy.
- Samantha Ruth Prabhu's response emphasizes the need for respect in public discourse.
Hyderabad, Sep 3 (NationPress) Renowned actor Nagarjuna Akkineni along with his son and fellow actor Naga Chaitanya appeared at a city court on Wednesday, where they recorded their statements concerning a criminal defamation case they initiated against Telangana minister Konda Surekha.
The duo attended the Nampally Metropolitan Magistrate Court, providing their statements to the presiding judge.
Speaking to reporters outside the court, Nagarjuna mentioned that the issue is now in the hands of the court, which will render a decision.
Last year, on October 2, Minister Konda Surekha made certain remarks regarding the divorce of Naga Chaitanya and actress Samantha Ruth Prabhu.
She implicated K. T. Rama Rao, the working president of Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS), in the divorce matter.
Samantha later clarified that her divorce was amicable and consensual, urging the minister to respect her privacy and not trivialize her personal experiences.
Following this, Konda Surekha stated on X that she was retracting her earlier comments.
The minister clarified that her comments were not intended to offend but to challenge a leader’s disrespect towards women.
Nevertheless, Nagarjuna filed a petition against the minister under section 356 of BNS.
He asserted that the minister’s statements tarnished the dignity and reputation of his family. Nagarjuna expressed that the minister had made disparaging remarks about his family, particularly concerning his son’s divorce.
He emphasized that Konda Surekha’s comments have damaged his family’s long-standing reputation, which has been built over decades in both the film industry and community service.
In October of the previous year, the court recorded statements from witnesses Yarlagadda Supriya and Venkateshwar Metla in this case.
Although Rama Rao, a BRS leader, issued a legal notice demanding an apology from the minister, she maintained her stance regarding her remarks about him.
In light of this, Rama Rao also commenced defamation proceedings against the minister.
Point of View
It is crucial to recognize the intersection of personal lives and public commentary. The dispute between Nagarjuna, Naga Chaitanya, and Minister Konda Surekha highlights the need for responsible dialogue in both entertainment and politics. The actions taken by the Akkineni family reflect a commitment to protecting their dignity, while the minister’s remarks underscore the challenges of navigating public opinion and personal narratives.
NationPress
03/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the defamation case about?
The defamation case involves actor Nagarjuna and his son Naga Chaitanya suing Telangana Minister Konda Surekha for remarks made about Naga Chaitanya's divorce, which they claim harmed their family's reputation.
What did Konda Surekha say?
Konda Surekha commented on the divorce, implicating BRS leader K. T. Rama Rao, which led to public backlash and a legal response from Nagarjuna and Naga Chaitanya.
What was Samantha's response to the comments?
Samantha clarified that her divorce was amicable and urged the minister to respect her privacy, stating her journey should not be trivialized.
What actions have been taken by the BRS leader?
BRS leader K. T. Rama Rao issued a legal notice to Minister Konda Surekha demanding a retraction of her statements and has initiated defamation proceedings against her.
What are the implications of this case?
The case raises questions about the responsibilities of public figures in discussing personal matters and the impact of their comments on individual reputations.
