Nandan Nilekani exam task force: Pawan Khera says BJP can't survive without Congress
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Political leaders across party lines on Monday, 27 July responded to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's announcement of a high-powered examination reform task force chaired by Nandan Nilekani, with reactions ranging from sharp political barbs to cautious welcome. The task force was constituted in the aftermath of the NEET-UG paper leak controversy, which sparked nationwide student protests and raised serious questions about the integrity of India's public examination system.
Congress Takes a Swipe
Congress MP Pawan Khera used the occasion to needle the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), arguing that the ruling party perpetually leans on Congress figures and their legacies. Speaking to reporters outside Parliament, Khera said: 'These people can't survive without Congress. Today, how many of their MPs originally came from the Congress? Without Congress, PM Modi cannot even take a breath. They start with Nehru and end with Nandan Nilekani.'
Fellow Congress MP Phulo Devi Netam took a more constructive line, welcoming the task force and calling reforms overdue. 'This should definitely happen. The way the paper leak issue surfaced repeatedly, students across the country protested, and they succeeded in getting their voices heard. We all want the education system to improve through this committee,' she said.
Akhilesh Yadav Questions the Timing
Samajwadi Party chief and Lok Sabha MP Akhilesh Yadav acknowledged the merit of the initiative but questioned why it had taken the government more than a decade to act. 'It is a good step. This task force includes many intellectuals who have served in important positions and contributed significantly to public life. But the question is, why is the government forming it today? Why was it not constituted in 2014? Had it been formed then, our country would have progressed much faster,' Yadav said.
This is not the first time the opposition has raised the issue of delayed institutional response to examination fraud — similar criticism followed paper leak incidents in 2022 and 2023 that affected state-level recruitment examinations.
BJP Defends the Move
BJP Bihar President Sanjay Saraogi defended the Centre's decision, framing it as a firm commitment to safeguarding student futures. 'An expert task force has been constituted because the Government of India will not tolerate anyone playing with the future of students under any circumstances. The government is strengthening the security of question papers while also ensuring strict laws and speedy punishment for those involved in paper leaks. At the same time, the expert committee will recommend measures to ensure that such incidents do not occur in the future,' he said.
BJP MP Naresh Bansal called the formation of the task force a significant step, saying it brings together 'highly experienced experts from the fields of education and other sectors.' BJP MP Tarun Chugh went further, criticising previous administrations: 'Those who remained in power for six decades did nothing on this issue. Over the past two terms, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has consistently worked to secure the future of children. The Prime Minister has made it clear that not a single person involved in paper leaks will be spared.'
Context: The NEET-UG Controversy
The NEET-UG paper leak controversy became one of the most politically charged education scandals in recent memory, with students in multiple states alleging that question papers had been circulated before the examination. The episode prompted calls for an overhaul of the National Testing Agency (NTA) and the broader examination infrastructure. The appointment of Nilekani — co-founder of Infosys and architect of the Aadhaar framework — signals an intent to bring technology-driven solutions to examination security.
What Comes Next
The task force is expected to submit recommendations on systemic reforms, including digitisation of question paper distribution and enhanced surveillance protocols. Whether its findings translate into legislative or structural change will depend on the government's follow-through — a point the opposition has already flagged as the critical test of intent.