What Techniques Were Used to Identify Prajwal Revanna in Obscene Videos?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The conviction of former JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna involves advanced techniques from international child pornography investigations. This remarkable case, which surfaced during the 2024 elections, uncovers the complex methods used to identify him in explicit videos. Join us as we delve into this shocking story that has captivated Karnataka and beyond.
Key Takeaways
- Investigative techniques: The case utilized advanced forensic methods.
- Political implications: The case involved a high-profile political figure.
- DNA evidence: Crucial for establishing guilt.
- Public reaction: The scandal ignited widespread controversy.
- Importance of accountability: No one is above the law.
Bengaluru, Aug 2 (NationPress) The Special Investigation Team (SIT) has successfully convicted former JD(S) MP Prajwal Revanna for his involvement in an obscene video and rape case concerning a 47-year-old woman. Remarkably, they utilized sophisticated techniques previously established in international child pornography investigations to confirm his identity, as reported by sources on Saturday.
The Special Court for MPs/MLAs in Bengaluru declared Prajwal Revanna, the grandson of former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda, guilty on Friday. The sentencing is expected to be announced today.
The primary obstacle in this case was the challenge of identifying Prajwal Revanna in the sexual assault video, which only depicted the victim and the lower part of the assailant's body.
SIT officials mentioned that this was a significant hurdle in the investigation, as many believed that Prajwal Revanna could evade justice due to the lack of a visible face in the numerous videos gathered.
Investigators drew inspiration from cases in Turkey and Japan, where identification was made by comparing anatomical features, including scars and genitalia, from obscene images sent to a girl.
In the case of Prajwal, meticulous analysis of screenshots from the video was conducted. Forensic examination focused on visible body parts, including genitals, palms, fingers, ankles, toes, and feet.
A dedicated team of forensic specialists, dermatologists, urologists, and orthopedists compared these features to those of Prajwal Revanna.
Voice analysis was also performed, as Prajwal's voice was captured in the video during the assault.
His identity was scientifically verified through distinct characteristics, such as a mole on his left middle finger, a scar on his left hand, and his bone structure.
The police also discovered a petticoat at the farmhouse's service quarters, which contained semen matching Prajwal Revanna's DNA. Furthermore, the victim's DNA was also found on the garment. Notably, the petticoat had been undisturbed for almost three years, allowing for the successful retrieval of usable forensic samples.
This scandal involving obscene videos came to light during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections when multiple pen drives filled with sexually explicit content featuring Prajwal Revanna were discovered throughout the Hassan Lok Sabha constituency, where he was seeking re-election.
The constituency was previously represented by his grandfather, former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda.
The videos ignited a significant controversy in Karnataka, as footage involving JD(S) party members and even a female police officer emerged.
On April 26, 2024, Prajwal Revanna fled to another country using a diplomatic passport, shortly after the elections. The following day, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah announced the creation of a Special Investigation Team (SIT).
The JD(S) expelled Prajwal Revanna from the party on April 30, 2024. While in hiding on May 1, 2024, he made his first social media post from abroad.
On May 2, 2024, a former maid lodged a police complaint accusing both Prajwal and his father, JD(S) MLA H.D. Revanna, of sexual assault. On May 3, 2024, the complainant was abducted but was later located at a farmhouse, where authorities rescued her.
On May 4, 2024, MLA H.D. Revanna was arrested. A Blue Corner Notice was issued against Prajwal Revanna on May 7, 2024. On May 23, 2024, former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda publicly appealed for Prajwal's return to India.
On May 27, 2024, Prajwal Revanna announced his return to India on May 31, 2024. He was apprehended at Bengaluru International Airport on that date. On August 1, 2024, the Special Court found Prajwal Revanna guilty.
Prajwal Revanna was convicted under IPC Sections 376 (2) (N) for repeatedly raping the same woman and for being a public servant committing rape on a woman in custody, 376 (2) (K) for raping a woman under his control, 354 (B) for using force against a woman with the intent to disrobe her, 354 (C) for voyeurism, and IT Act 66 (E) for privacy violations.
Point of View
This case exemplifies the importance of robust investigative techniques in addressing serious crimes. It reinforces the commitment to justice, regardless of the individual's political stature, and highlights the need for transparency in the legal process. The involvement of advanced forensic methods emphasizes the evolution of investigative standards in India, ensuring that no one is above the law.
NationPress
19/08/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What techniques did the SIT use to identify Prajwal Revanna?
The SIT applied advanced methods from international child pornography investigations, including forensic analysis of body features and voice recognition.
What was the outcome of the case?
Prajwal Revanna was convicted of rape and other offenses, with sentencing expected to follow shortly.
Why was this case significant?
This case is significant as it highlights the use of advanced forensic techniques in high-profile investigations and raises issues of accountability.
What role did the petticoat play in the investigation?
The petticoat contained DNA evidence linking Prajwal Revanna to the crime, which was crucial for establishing his guilt.
How did the political implications affect the investigation?
The case drew significant media attention due to the political background of the accused, which highlighted the challenges of ensuring impartiality in high-profile cases.
