Did Raut Just Label 'Op Sindoor' a Failure and Call for Shah's Resignation Over Pahalgam Attack?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Sanjay Raut ignites controversy by declaring 'Operation Sindoor' a failure and demanding Amit Shah's resignation. The political implications of this statement could shake the current administration. Discover why this has become a hot topic in Indian politics.
Key Takeaways
- Sanjay Raut criticizes 'Operation Sindoor' as a failure.
- Calls for the resignation of Amit Shah over Pahalgam terror attack.
- Political tensions escalate within the Opposition.
- Demands for a special Parliament session arise.
- Government faces scrutiny over national security issues.
Mumbai, May 27 (NationPress) Rajya Sabha MP and Shiv Sena (UBT) leader, Sanjay Raut, stirred a political controversy on Tuesday by labeling 'Operation Sindoor' a 'failure' and calling for the resignation of Union Home Minister Amit Shah due to his alleged failure to avert the Pahalgam terror attack.
While speaking to the press, Raut stated, “The 'Operation Sindoor' is a failure. However, we in the Opposition, hold back from discussing it for the nation's sake.”
“Additionally, why was there a necessity for 'Operation Sindoor'? Because 26 individuals lost their lives in Pahalgam, and Amit Shah must be held accountable,” he emphasized.
“The Prime Minister should have demanded the resignation of Amit Shah for his negligence. Instead, Amit Shah is lecturing us,” Raut remarked, referencing the Home Minister's comments made on Monday.
During a rally in Nanded the previous day, HM Shah claimed that if Balasaheb Thackeray were alive, he would have ‘embraced’ Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the achievements of 'Operation Sindoor'.
Responding to this, Raut asserted, “Balasaheb Thackeray would have been filled with sorrow” for supporting BJP leaders amidst past controversies.
Raut criticized NDA leaders for politicizing the situation and making insensitive remarks regarding 'Operation Sindoor', while Sanjay Nirupam from Shiv Sena (Shinde) claimed, “Sanjay Raut has lost his mind and is not mentally stable...”
Earlier, Raut reiterated the INDIA bloc’s call for a special two-day session of Parliament to discuss 'Operation Sindoor' and the Pahalgam terror attack. “Instead of acknowledging our request, the BJP dispatched all-party delegations abroad,” he remarked.
He asserted that PM Modi and HM Shah are fearful of facing inquiries, which is why the demand for a special session from Opposition leaders, including Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, has gone unheeded.
The comments from the Shiv Sena (UBT) leader coincide with a global diplomatic initiative by India, which has sent all-party MP delegations to allied nations to explain its stance against terrorism.
Point of View
It is crucial to maintain a balanced perspective. Raut's claims regarding 'Operation Sindoor' and the subsequent call for Shah's resignation highlight the tensions within Indian politics. The ongoing discourse emphasizes the need for accountability and transparency in governance, especially regarding national security.
NationPress
08/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is 'Operation Sindoor'?
Operation Sindoor is a security initiative launched by the Indian government aimed at countering terrorism, particularly in sensitive regions.
Why did Sanjay Raut declare it a failure?
Raut labeled it a failure due to the recent Pahalgam terror attack which resulted in the loss of 26 lives, indicating a failure of security measures.
What are the implications of Raut's statements?
Raut's statements may lead to increased scrutiny of the government's security policies and could impact the political landscape ahead of elections.
What is the response from the government?
The government has not officially responded to Raut's remarks, but there is ongoing political discourse surrounding the accountability of the Home Minister.
What is the INDIA bloc's stance?
The INDIA bloc, which includes various opposition parties, is demanding a special session of Parliament to discuss the implications of Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam attack.
