Rijiju Defends Himself Against Gogoi's 'Interrupter' Allegation
Synopsis
In a heated exchange in the Lok Sabha, Kiren Rijiju counters Gaurav Gogoi's claims of being the 'biggest interrupter.' Rijiju defends the integrity of the Parliamentary Affairs Ministry and highlights the significant reforms during Speaker Om Birla's tenure.
Key Takeaways
Kiren Rijiju defends against accusations of interruption in the Lok Sabha.
He labels Gaurav Gogoi as immature and uninformed .
Rijiju highlights the importance of understanding the Parliamentary Affairs Ministry's responsibilities .
Significant reforms have occurred under Speaker Om Birla's tenure .
The Speaker is expected to maintain impartiality during proceedings.
New Delhi, March 10 (NationPress) The Minister of Parliamentary Affairs, Kiren Rijiju, addressed Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi's accusation of being the "most prominent interrupter" in the Lok Sabha. Rijiju stated on Tuesday that while the Opposition MP is entitled to his perspective, he remains "immature and uninformed" regarding the responsibilities tied to the ministry.
In his comments regarding the opposition motion against Speaker Om Birla, Rijiju emphasized that all members, whether from the ruling party or the Opposition, are governed by the laws and regulations set forth by the Constitution.
"When someone places themselves above others, it is crucial to call them out," Rijiju remarked, subtly alluding to Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi.
In response to Gogoi's assertions, Rijiju pointed out that despite being a three-time MP, Gogoi appears unaware of the duties of the Parliamentary Affairs Ministry.
"He is like a younger brother to me, but before criticizing the role and duties of the Parliamentary Affairs Ministry, one must comprehend the intricacies of its workings," he noted.
Previously, Congress MP Gogoi stated, "In the future, when research is conducted on parliamentary records, statistics will reveal that Kiren Rijiju was the Parliamentary Affairs Minister who interrupted the Opposition the most."
Rijiju further criticized the Opposition for introducing a motion to oust Speaker Om Birla, stressing that it is a well-known fact that the Speaker originates from the ruling party. However, it is also a fact that once someone becomes Speaker, they remain impartial.
"When chairing House proceedings, the Speaker is expected to maintain impartiality and fairness," he added, highlighting the "unprecedented changes" that have occurred during Birla’s tenure.
"Remarkable reforms have taken shape under Om Birla’s leadership, enabling new members to have ample opportunities to voice their concerns in the House. Urgent public matters have been raised more frequently during his term. The transition to a paperless parliament and digitization of records have all been accomplished under Om Birla's guidance," he concluded, lamenting the Opposition's motion against him.
Point of View
It is crucial to remain neutral in this political exchange. Kiren Rijiju's defense against Gaurav Gogoi's accusation reflects the intricate dynamics of parliamentary roles and responsibilities. The emphasis on reforms under Speaker Om Birla also highlights the ongoing transformations within the Lok Sabha, warranting a closer look at the evolving landscape of Indian politics.
NationPress
8 Aug 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Gaurav Gogoi's accusation against Kiren Rijiju?
Gaurav Gogoi accused Kiren Rijiju of being the 'biggest interrupter' in the Lok Sabha.
How did Kiren Rijiju respond to the accusation?
Kiren Rijiju acknowledged Gogoi's view but labeled him as 'immature and uninformed' regarding the responsibilities of the Parliamentary Affairs Ministry.
What notable reforms did Rijiju mention during the discussion?
Rijiju highlighted reforms such as the transition to a paperless parliament and increased opportunities for new members to speak during House proceedings.
Who is the current Speaker of the Lok Sabha?
The current Speaker of the Lok Sabha is Om Birla.
What did Rijiju say about the Speaker's role?
Rijiju emphasized that the Speaker must remain impartial and unbiased while chairing House proceedings.
