Rijiju Critiques Rahul's Conduct Amid No-Confidence Motion Against Speaker
Synopsis
In a heated debate, Kiren Rijiju challenged the Opposition's ethics regarding a no-confidence motion against the Lok Sabha Speaker, while also criticizing Rahul Gandhi's past antics in Parliament. This exchange highlighted the tensions within the House and the need for adherence to parliamentary decorum.
Key Takeaways
Kiren Rijiju challenged the ethics of the Opposition during the debate.
He criticized Rahul Gandhi for his informal remarks and behavior in Parliament.
Rijiju suggested Priyanka Gandhi could be more effective as Leader of Opposition.
The Speaker's role as a guardian of decorum was emphasized.
There are ongoing concerns about the Opposition's motives in bringing the no-confidence motion.
New Delhi, March 10 (NationPress) In a recent debate, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju scrutinized the ethics of the Opposition for proposing a no-confidence motion against the Lok Sabha Speaker. He took aim at Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi for his behavior in the House, referencing past moments where he has embraced the Prime Minister and winked at fellow MPs in Parliament.
Rijiju emphasized that during the initial session of the Budget Session, Gandhi asserted that he could speak freely without needing anyone's approval.
“This kind of behavior is unacceptable. There are many experienced members in the party who should guide him, yet they complain that Rahul's microphone is being turned off to silence him,” Rijiju commented.
In reference to Gandhi's informal address to the chair as 'yaar', the Union Minister stated that the Speaker serves as the guardian of the House and should not be subjected to such casual remarks.
Rijiju further pointed out that all members of the House are obligated to adhere to established rules, and no one should see themselves as above parliamentary protocol.
“When someone believes they are above all else, it is necessary to call them out,” he remarked, clearly referring to Rahul Gandhi.
He also recalled an incident from 2018 when Rahul winked in the House, stating, “I have never encountered a leader who hugs the Prime Minister and then winks at fellow party members.”
Rijiju's mention of 'smiling' Priyanka Gandhi drew significant attention, as he suggested she might be a better fit than Rahul for the Leader of Opposition role.
“She spends more time in the House, is more approachable, and could handle the role more effectively,” he noted while Priyanka listened with a smile, prompting laughter from the treasury benches.
In defense of the Speaker's interventions, he said the Speaker aims to discipline 'undisciplined and unruly' MPs, akin to how parents correct their children at home. However, some individuals remain obstinate and disregard the Chair.
Rijiju concluded by asserting that the motion against the Speaker was a calculated move by the Opposition to undermine constitutional bodies.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Kiren Rijiju's main argument in the debate?
He questioned the morality of the Opposition's no-confidence motion against the Lok Sabha Speaker and criticized Rahul Gandhi's behavior in Parliament.
What specific actions of Rahul Gandhi did Rijiju reference?
Rijiju mentioned Gandhi's past instances of hugging the Prime Minister and winking at fellow MPs.
What did Rijiju suggest about Priyanka Gandhi's potential role?
He suggested that Priyanka Gandhi could be a better candidate for the Leader of Opposition position due to her approachability and dedication.
How did Rijiju defend the Speaker's interventions?
He stated that the Speaker aims to correct 'undisciplined and unruly' MPs, similar to how parents guide their children.
What is the implication of the no-confidence motion against the Speaker?
Rijiju claimed it was a strategic move by the Opposition to tarnish the reputation of constitutional bodies.
